On Jan. 13, Taiwan, backed by democratic individuals, groups and countries worldwide, succeeded to uphold democracy in the face of formidable challenges and threats posed by the semi-powerful communism and authoritarianism of the People’s Republic of China. It is time for Taiwan and president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to reciprocate. Taiwan is uniquely positioned to work with Afghan democrats and democracies worldwide, which could pave the way for democracy’s resurgence in Afghanistan.
Taiwan has always stirred feelings of curiosity and admiration among Afghans. They are majorly sympathetic toward Taiwan’s cause of freedom, independence and democracy. Afghans also share Taiwan’s resilience, yet their aspirations have been thwarted. Despite two decades of investment from the US and the international community in blood, time and resources, Afghanistan has not only lost its democracy, but also witnessed the collapse of its political system, plunging into a state of disarray since Aug. 15, 2021, that has resulted in more than 20 million women and girls being practically imprisoned inside their homes with no right to education, work, or travel and movement.
Afghanistan lacks a legitimate government. That means there is no diplomatic and consular services available for Afghans overseas. For example, there is no functioning Afghan embassy in Washington to cater to the needs of more than 100,000 Afghans evacuated by the US, as well as those who have resided there for decades. Consequently, any document-related matters necessitate correspondence with the Afghan embassy in Canada. They are diligently attending to the needs of Afghan-Americans and other Afghan residents in the US. In many countries, Afghan embassies have closed their doors or fallen under the control of the Taliban — the most authoritarian group globally.
This dire situation underscores the extent of Afghanistan’s collapse. Afghans are particularly upset as they see countries such as China warming to the Taliban. They are wondering why the Chinese people, if they truly govern their country, associate with a group as authoritarian, backward and uncivilized as the Taliban, particularly given its misguided interpretation of Islam and repressive policies against Afghan women and girls. Obviously, Chinese are not in charge, and instead it is the Chinese Communist Party, which is as authoritarian and repressive as the Taliban and that quality makes them natural allies.
Clearly, animosity and hatred are only perpetuated by the self-serving authoritarian elites under the guise of national interests, fueling and instigating conflict, war and chaos. Unfortunately, such elites are in power in Afghanistan, China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan and some other countries.
Moreover, authoritarian regimes and elites collaborate discreetly and very closely to support each other and their counterparts worldwide. They achieve this by meddling in elections, resorting to propaganda to the extent of infiltration among political elites. Naturally, all democracies are vulnerable and susceptible to manipulation — no single democracy can safeguard itself against this coalition of authoritarians alone.
This underscores the need for democratic individuals, groups and countries worldwide to unite and protect themselves collectively. Taiwan serves as a prime example, where democrats worldwide rallied to support Taiwanese in safeguarding their election integrity. And they succeeded.
It is time for Taiwan to reciprocate. As a bold foreign policy initiative Taiwan could take the lead in rallying support for non-Taliban Afghans, particularly Afghan women whose rights can only be safeguarded and guaranteed in a democratic Afghanistan.
By spearheading the restoration of democracy in Afghanistan, Taiwan could eventually forge a strong alliance with a democratic Afghanistan. This is a major opportunity for Taiwan. It should only allocate the necessary diplomatic energy to unite the scattered democratic forces of Afghanistan and Afghanistan’s allies worldwide.
In return for this diplomatic effort, Taiwan could shape the future of a neighbor of China, while gaining influence and goodwill among Afghans.
It should not require much of a lift for Taiwan, as many of its staunch supporters are already aligned with the necessary actions. However, none of them have the appetite, and are not willing to take the lead on Afghanistan. Instead, they have all deferred the responsibility to the UN.
While the UN is attempting to play a role, it remains uncertain whether it possesses the capability and resources to effectively move toward a solution.
Moreover, as the UN tries to maintain consensus among member states, it would be immensely helpful for a proactive country on the democratic side of the fence to assume leadership of the process. There should be at least one country to step up as a host and champion for the cause of the non-Taliban Afghans, especially Afghan women, who are yearning for freedom and democracy.
Taiwan could be that country. With the successful conclusion of its elections, Taiwan must have diplomatic and financial resources to emerge from a constantly defensive posture to take the lead on a major initiative to advance its interests.
Sadiq Amini is a program manager at ORF America, overseeing external relations and outreach. He was previously a political assistant at the US embassy in Kabul and worked at the Afghan Permanent Mission to the UN. The views expressed here are strictly his own.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
RSS