In the past week, lawmakers of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the main opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have been debating whether President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) should visit Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) to reinforce Taiwan’s sovereignty claim before she steps down from office in May.
Whether the head of state visiting the outpost would be in Taiwan’s national interest is questionable. Why the KMT would choose to push Tsai to visit at this time is even more questionable.
Located 1,500km southwest of Kaohsiung, Itu Aba is the largest of the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島), a disputed archipelago of more than 100 small islands and reefs in the South China Sea. The island hosts a few structures and about 200 members of the coast guard who hold defense drills regularly. It is also claimed by China, the Philippines and Vietnam.
Since Taiwan in January completed a major maintenance and dredging project, which would allow larger vessels, up to 4,000-tonne patrol frigates, to dock at the wharf on the island, there had been calls by legislators for Tsai to attend the wharf reopening ceremony on Monday to reassert the nation’s sovereignty.
As the president did not attend the ceremony, the KMT legislative caucus on Tuesday urged her to visit the island before the end of her second term on May 19. Its caucus convener, Fu Kun-chi , accused Tsai of “chickening out” like a turtle huddled up inside its shell, and its legislators said that Tsai and the DPP do not dare to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity.
The legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee co-convener, KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君), on Tuesday said the committee has arranged to visit and inspect the island on May 16.
They also cited former presidents Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) and Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) visits to the island before stepping down from office in urging Tsai to do the same.
Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) on Wednesday reaffirmed Taiwan’s sovereignty over the island, but cited the recent dangerous standoff between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea, adding that Taiwan “must consider how to use peaceful means to resolve the South China Sea issue, not letting others think we are creating difficulties.”
National Security Bureau Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) on Thursday also advised against the visit at this time, raising concerns that the trip might be perceived by other countries as intensifying the already tense geopolitical situation, and poses potential security risks to the head of state, as Chinese military aircraft and warships have reportedly been shadowing non-Chinese vessels and aircraft in the disputed waters.
China Coast Guard vessels have been reported repeatedly trying to harass and block Philippine resupply vessels in the South China Sea, including using water cannons and causing collisions, since December last year, with the latest collision reported by Manila yesterday morning.
While it is unwise to stir up unnecessary conflict in the region, it is worth noting that since the Taiwanese government established a garrison on Itu Aba in 1956, Chen and Ma are the only two presidents who have visited the island.
The move could not have had any impact on the ongoing South China Sea tribunal in The Hague at that time, as Itu Aba is viewed technically as a rock and not an island, and therefore not subject to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
It is worth questioning why KMT lawmakers such as Ma Wen-chun are all of a sudden eager to “defend the nation and claim sovereignty,” when they continue to keep quiet as Chinese aircraft and vessels increasingly cross the Taiwan Strait median line.
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,