In the past week, lawmakers of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the main opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have been debating whether President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) should visit Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) to reinforce Taiwan’s sovereignty claim before she steps down from office in May.
Whether the head of state visiting the outpost would be in Taiwan’s national interest is questionable. Why the KMT would choose to push Tsai to visit at this time is even more questionable.
Located 1,500km southwest of Kaohsiung, Itu Aba is the largest of the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島), a disputed archipelago of more than 100 small islands and reefs in the South China Sea. The island hosts a few structures and about 200 members of the coast guard who hold defense drills regularly. It is also claimed by China, the Philippines and Vietnam.
Since Taiwan in January completed a major maintenance and dredging project, which would allow larger vessels, up to 4,000-tonne patrol frigates, to dock at the wharf on the island, there had been calls by legislators for Tsai to attend the wharf reopening ceremony on Monday to reassert the nation’s sovereignty.
As the president did not attend the ceremony, the KMT legislative caucus on Tuesday urged her to visit the island before the end of her second term on May 19. Its caucus convener, Fu Kun-chi , accused Tsai of “chickening out” like a turtle huddled up inside its shell, and its legislators said that Tsai and the DPP do not dare to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity.
The legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee co-convener, KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君), on Tuesday said the committee has arranged to visit and inspect the island on May 16.
They also cited former presidents Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) and Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) visits to the island before stepping down from office in urging Tsai to do the same.
Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) on Wednesday reaffirmed Taiwan’s sovereignty over the island, but cited the recent dangerous standoff between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea, adding that Taiwan “must consider how to use peaceful means to resolve the South China Sea issue, not letting others think we are creating difficulties.”
National Security Bureau Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) on Thursday also advised against the visit at this time, raising concerns that the trip might be perceived by other countries as intensifying the already tense geopolitical situation, and poses potential security risks to the head of state, as Chinese military aircraft and warships have reportedly been shadowing non-Chinese vessels and aircraft in the disputed waters.
China Coast Guard vessels have been reported repeatedly trying to harass and block Philippine resupply vessels in the South China Sea, including using water cannons and causing collisions, since December last year, with the latest collision reported by Manila yesterday morning.
While it is unwise to stir up unnecessary conflict in the region, it is worth noting that since the Taiwanese government established a garrison on Itu Aba in 1956, Chen and Ma are the only two presidents who have visited the island.
The move could not have had any impact on the ongoing South China Sea tribunal in The Hague at that time, as Itu Aba is viewed technically as a rock and not an island, and therefore not subject to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
It is worth questioning why KMT lawmakers such as Ma Wen-chun are all of a sudden eager to “defend the nation and claim sovereignty,” when they continue to keep quiet as Chinese aircraft and vessels increasingly cross the Taiwan Strait median line.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did
RSS