Dozens of developed and developing countries, representing half of the world’s population, are set to hold or have already held elections this year. While the outcome of some races might seem predetermined, the upcoming elections in the US and India, as well as Taiwan’s presidential election in January, would have far-reaching global implications, regardless of who wins.
For the world’s liberal democracies, the most consequential of these races is undoubtedly November’s US presidential election.
Regrettably, it is possible, perhaps even likely, that US voters would elect former US president Donald Trump. Given that Trump has shown no regard for the rule of law and prefers the company of autocratic leaders to that of democratically elected ones, free societies around the world would anxiously await the results. Many would be praying for US President Joe Biden to win.
Another critical election, at least for Europe, would be the UK’s upcoming general election, which is expected to take place sometime in the second half of the year.
With a 20 percent lead in the polls, the opposition Labour Party is the clear frontrunner. However, given the country’s political dysfunction, it remains to be seen whether Labour would be able to implement its economic policy agenda.
The British economy and political system have been upended over the past few years by the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine.
While the UK’s Conservative Party government maintains that it should not be blamed for global developments beyond its control, it should be held accountable for facilitating the UK’s disastrous exit from the EU.
Overall, British politicians are reluctant to talk about Brexit. This could be partly attributed to many voters’ unwillingness to broach the subject, especially those misled by the “Leave” campaign, and to the efforts of prominent Brexiteers to shut down debate. However, the UK’s current economic woes — falling exports, slowing growth, low productivity, high taxes and strained public finances — underscore the urgency of confronting Brexit’s catastrophic consequences.
FIXING BREXIT MISTAKES
To be sure, commanding and retaining majority support for some of the difficult decisions ahead would not be easy. It is astonishing that the decision to leave the EU — arguably the UK’s most consequential decision since the end of World War II — was made with little to no planning, based on lies, empty promises and misconceptions.
The country’s current predicament brings to mind the iconic final scene of the 1969 film The Italian Job, in which a group of robbers led by Michael Caine makes a getaway in a bus heavily loaded with stacks of gold bars. While speeding through a sharp mountainous curve, the coach ends up teetering on the edge of a cliff. The gold is positioned at one end of the bus, and the thieves are at the opposite end, with any sudden movement potentially sending the vehicle tumbling down.
Caine’s closing line could have served as a slogan for the “Leave” campaign: “Hang on a minute, lads, I’ve got a great idea.”
Brexiteers’ promises that leaving the EU would revitalize British sovereignty and usher in an era of economic prosperity were rooted in misguided optimism. Now, confronted with the painful consequences of its decision, the UK finds itself at a crossroads.
So, as Russian revolutionary Vladimir Lenin once asked: “What is to be done?”
First, British voters must ensure that their political leaders can no longer remain in denial about what happened.
Second, the UK must repair its relationship with the EU.
While some might hope that the UK would rejoin the EU, such an outcome is extremely unlikely without meaningful changes to the bloc’s structure. A scenario in which the UK adheres to most of the EU’s economic rules without playing a role in shaping them seems to be a nonstarter.
What British policymakers could do, albeit at the risk of raising the ire of Europhobes in British Parliament and the media, is to work more closely with their European counterparts to undo some of the damage caused by Brexit. Specifically, Britain should collaborate on defense, especially with France, to complement its NATO commitments.
Moreover, the UK could mitigate some of the disruption to trade with Europe and other countries by reconsidering its previous opposition to regulatory alignment.
Why, for example, should the UK’s rules on health and phytosanitary standards differ from those of the EU?
WORKING WITH THE EU
The two sides could collaborate on a range of issues, such as artificial intelligence, education, visas and professional licensing.
Given the ongoing migration crisis, British policymakers must also work closely with their European counterparts on how best to address the root causes of mass immigration from Africa and West Asia.
This could involve a combination of aid and security measures designed to encourage potential asylum seekers to stay in their home countries rather than risk the perilous journey to Europe.
These issues should be at the top of the next government’s agenda, whether it is led by Labour or the Conservative Party. Crucially, the UK must avoid the pitfalls of mindless right-wing populism, which fails to provide sustainable solutions and remains deeply unpopular.
Over the past few years, the UK has showcased its lack of intelligent and effective governance, leading the international community to approach its upcoming election with indifference. It is up to whoever wins to restore Britain’s global standing by putting it back on the path to economic prosperity, security and self-respect.
Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong and a former EU commissioner for external affairs, is chancellor of the University of Oxford and the author of The Hong Kong Diaries.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
RSS