Media reported this month that a one-year-old boy nicknamed Kai Kai (愷愷) died as a result of abuse in December last year at the hands of a woman surnamed Liu (劉), who was his foster caregiver, causing much public anger.
Ironically, Liu had written a comment on social media in support of the idea that “the death penalty is the only punishment for child murderers.”
However, there is another important aspect of the case.
As a licensed nanny, Liu would have looked after many children without incident; that is, apart from Kai Kai.
On her social media pages, there is also evidence of the passion and attentiveness she had for childcare.
So what psychological mechanism made it possible for her to become a child abuser and even a killer?
Liu might have a pathological tendency to be a so-called “justice warrior,” with an abnormal sense of mission.
Before she became Kai Kai’s nanny, she must have known that the child’s father had lost contact with him and his mother was in prison.
For her, his family history was his “original sin.”
It is inevitable that a one-year-old would be a little naughty or difficult to communicate with. For other children who were that way, she might have seen them as “active and smart,” but perhaps she saw Kai Kai as “a bad child with criminal tendencies.”
She might have thought: “As the nanny of this bad child, I should educate and punish him to prevent the offspring of criminal parents from also harming society when he grows up.”
The morbid tendencies of a justice warrior might have allowed Liu to rationalize her abusive behavior as disciplining a “bad” child.
She even shared her philosophy on discipline with her younger sister online.
For nannies and the children they care for, there is already a gap in psychological maturity.
As for a justice warrior nanny, she is more likely to be self-centered and take on the responsibility of educating and disciplining a child inappropriately when faced with incessant crying, ultimately leading to regrettable events.
Training courses for nanny licenses should teach the legal responsibilities of the job, the penalties for child abuse and the scope of appropriate discipline. That would establish proper conduct and help prevent tragedies such as those perpetrated by the punishment of a justice warrior.
Another way to improve the social safety net would be to improve the single-person tracking and counseling methods of social workers, promote random visits by supervisors and recruit “secret visitors” — workers who enter the homes of carers to observe their behavior without the carer knowing they are being scrutinized.
Public sensitivity to child abuse incidents also needs to be bolstered.
By improving the social safety net, every child can have the chance to grow up in peace and security.
Tai Shen-feng is a professor in National Chung Cheng University’s department of criminology.
Translated by Eddy Chang
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS