US President Joe Biden on Thursday last week vowed to support peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait — the first time he did so in a State of the Union Address.
Biden had on four occasions — mainly in response to media queries — asserted that Washington would provide military aid to defend Taiwan against a hypothetical invasion by China. During his address to the US Congress, the US president did not, as is customary, start with domestic affairs, focusing instead on international issues, such as Taiwan.
“We’re standing up against China’s unfair economic practices, and standing up for peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait,” he said.
Biden added that he has revitalized the nation’s partnerships and alliances in the Asia-Pacific region and made sure the most advanced US technologies cannot be used in Chinese weapons.
“We’re in a stronger position to win the competition for the 21st century against China,” he said.
While the US presidential election in November will almost certainly be a rematch between Biden and former US president Donald Trump, Biden’s address is widely considered to have made the case that he has done a better job in foreign affairs than Trump, who is considered a transactional leader prioritizing US interests and taking an isolationist strategy in international affairs.
Biden’s words are not only a warning to China about its escalating military intrusions across the Taiwan Strait, they also set the tone that no matter who wins the election, confronting China’s economic unfairness and geopolitical expansionism will be a major challenge — as it is with Russia.
Biden’s statement also confronted the rising “US skepticism,” which has long been promoted by Beijing’s state propaganda to subvert relations between the US and its allies, including Taiwan.
A spokesperson for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office recently said that “the US could abandon Taiwan under a second Trump presidency” and “the US will always pursue ‘America First,’ and Taiwan could change from a ‘chess piece’ to an ‘abandoned piece’ at any time.”
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) and his new administration, which is to take office in May, should get prepared for the US election and set up a new strategy to ensure mutually trustworthy and beneficial relations with the US. One priority should be to put Taiwan-China tensions under the Indo-Pacific framework to ensure that US foreign policy maintains its influence and keep order in the region, which would benefit Taipei.
If Trump returns to the White House, that would also cause concerns for China and Russia. Trump in 2016 made a historic phone call to then-president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), a leap forward in US-
Taiwan relations that put a hole in China’s coercive “one China” principle.
Taiwan should also advance cooperation with international like-minded democracies, especially with neighboring the Philippines, India, Japan and South Korea. Manila has struck new security agreements with at least 18 countries since a China Coast Guard vessel last year flashed a military-grade laser at Philippine ships, aiming to establish a “network of alliances.” Taiwan could learn from its example by establishing a security campaign spanning the South and East China seas, as well as the Taiwan Strait, to deter Chinese aggression.
Having a shared threat perception could be one of the most important drivers for closer strategic relations, experts have said.
Taiwan’s incoming government should make the best of concerns in Washington and the international community over China’s coercive expansionism to help safeguard the nation’s sovereignty and development.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS