US President Joe Biden on Thursday last week vowed to support peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait — the first time he did so in a State of the Union Address.
Biden had on four occasions — mainly in response to media queries — asserted that Washington would provide military aid to defend Taiwan against a hypothetical invasion by China. During his address to the US Congress, the US president did not, as is customary, start with domestic affairs, focusing instead on international issues, such as Taiwan.
“We’re standing up against China’s unfair economic practices, and standing up for peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait,” he said.
Biden added that he has revitalized the nation’s partnerships and alliances in the Asia-Pacific region and made sure the most advanced US technologies cannot be used in Chinese weapons.
“We’re in a stronger position to win the competition for the 21st century against China,” he said.
While the US presidential election in November will almost certainly be a rematch between Biden and former US president Donald Trump, Biden’s address is widely considered to have made the case that he has done a better job in foreign affairs than Trump, who is considered a transactional leader prioritizing US interests and taking an isolationist strategy in international affairs.
Biden’s words are not only a warning to China about its escalating military intrusions across the Taiwan Strait, they also set the tone that no matter who wins the election, confronting China’s economic unfairness and geopolitical expansionism will be a major challenge — as it is with Russia.
Biden’s statement also confronted the rising “US skepticism,” which has long been promoted by Beijing’s state propaganda to subvert relations between the US and its allies, including Taiwan.
A spokesperson for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office recently said that “the US could abandon Taiwan under a second Trump presidency” and “the US will always pursue ‘America First,’ and Taiwan could change from a ‘chess piece’ to an ‘abandoned piece’ at any time.”
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) and his new administration, which is to take office in May, should get prepared for the US election and set up a new strategy to ensure mutually trustworthy and beneficial relations with the US. One priority should be to put Taiwan-China tensions under the Indo-Pacific framework to ensure that US foreign policy maintains its influence and keep order in the region, which would benefit Taipei.
If Trump returns to the White House, that would also cause concerns for China and Russia. Trump in 2016 made a historic phone call to then-president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), a leap forward in US-
Taiwan relations that put a hole in China’s coercive “one China” principle.
Taiwan should also advance cooperation with international like-minded democracies, especially with neighboring the Philippines, India, Japan and South Korea. Manila has struck new security agreements with at least 18 countries since a China Coast Guard vessel last year flashed a military-grade laser at Philippine ships, aiming to establish a “network of alliances.” Taiwan could learn from its example by establishing a security campaign spanning the South and East China seas, as well as the Taiwan Strait, to deter Chinese aggression.
Having a shared threat perception could be one of the most important drivers for closer strategic relations, experts have said.
Taiwan’s incoming government should make the best of concerns in Washington and the international community over China’s coercive expansionism to help safeguard the nation’s sovereignty and development.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS