Last week and over the week, China held its “two sessions” — the annual meetings of the National People’s Congress and the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference.
Although not many remarkable discussions about national defense were immediately evident, some points of interest have emerged from the information that has been officially released.
First, many of the documents reiterate the importance of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This is often linked with China’s emphasis that the military must “follow the party, fight to win and forge exemplary conduct.”
Evidently, the longstanding slogan of “the party commands the gun” is still firmly entrenched. If that is the main consideration when appointing personnel, could it not lead to officials prioritizing “redness” over expertise, which could result in amateurs leading professionals?
On top of restating the importance of the CCP, reports delivered during the “two sessions” also highlighted the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “outstanding” completion of tasks and missions over the past year. The main purpose of this is probably to “reaffirm” Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) unprecedented third term in office.
Regarding military expenditures, aside from the costs of equipment, drills and logistics, the PLA has also been paying close attention to its troops’ wages and conditions. This might have something to do with the weak state of China’s economy.
When the overall economy is in trouble, increased defense spending covers the cost of maintaining military personnel’s pay and conditions, which would help with recruitment, despite the country’s falling birthrate.
As in the past, the “two sessions” stressed the development of relations between the military and civilians. Officials discussed building military bases, boosting the armed forces’ ability to mobilize “new-domain forces with new combat capabilities” and the defense technology industrial complex.
Compared with China’s previous emphasis on “military-civilian fusion,” the CCP is now even more eager to “find military potential in civilian capabilities,” which means using civilian talent and capital along with military-civilian dual-use construction to develop its national defense.
With regard to international attitudes, at last month’s Singapore Airshow, China’s strategic desire to become a major power was on clear display.
China showcased its weaponry and demonstrated that it has branched out into flight simulation systems and navigation control devices. It was even offering flight training courses. Along with selling military hardware, it promoted its defense wares through integrated packages that include software and personnel training.
Another thing that was noticeable at the show was other nations’ wariness of Chinese media and exhibitors.
The clearest example was when some Chinese attendees wanted to get a closer view of a German Air Force Airbus military transport aircraft, but were denied entry by a German crew member. Furthermore, questions asked by Chinese representatives were all skillfully deflected. This is indicative of various countries’ current attitudes.
Although China is gradually moving away from its previous “wolf warrior” style of diplomacy, many countries still see it as posing some kind of threat. This will be a thorny problem for China as it grows into a major military power.
Lin Ying-yu is an assistant professor in Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The recent passing of Taiwanese actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known to many as “Big S,” due to influenza-induced pneumonia at just 48 years old is a devastating reminder that the flu is not just a seasonal nuisance — it is a serious and potentially fatal illness. Hsu, a beloved actress and cultural icon who shaped the memories of many growing up in Taiwan, should not have died from a preventable disease. Yet her death is part of a larger trend that Taiwan has ignored for too long — our collective underestimation of the flu and our low uptake of the
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Actress Barbie Hsu (徐熙媛), known affectionately as “Big S,” recently passed away from pneumonia caused by the flu. The Mandarin word for the flu — which translates to “epidemic cold” in English — is misleading. Although the flu tends to spread rapidly and shares similar symptoms with the common cold, its name easily leads people to underestimate its dangers and delay seeking medical treatment. The flu is an acute viral respiratory illness, and there are vaccines to prevent its spread and strengthen immunity. This being the case, the Mandarin word for “influenza” used in Taiwan should be renamed from the misleading