The Legislative Yuan began its 11th term on Feb. 1 and its new members have been vying to make a name for themselves. They know they are at an inflection point, which makes for exciting observation.
Of the 113 seats, 54 are held by newcomers voted into office with lofty promises of reform. Their presence alone is enough to make for a volatile first session, but in addition, for the first time since 2004, no party holds an absolute majority.
At best, this would make the legislature a more active marketplace of ideas, as parties need to make a convincing case for their policies to gain traction. At worst, it could lock the legislature into a stalemate.
The three main parties have hit the ground running to set the tone for the first term. Lacking the presidency and grasping legislative power by its fingernails, the main opposition, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), in a strategic move, has chosen to champion oversight reform. Its caucus wants to give lawmakers — read: themselves — the right to conduct investigations, hold hearings and approve appointments to better oversee the Executive Yuan, as well as mandate an annual “state of the nation” address by the president.
Accompanying its calls for procedural reform, the party has continued its trend of oversight through disruption by taking opportunistic advantage of the daily controversy. KMT members were sure to make a scene at the new legislature’s first meeting on Feb. 20 by delaying Premier Chen Chien-jen’s (陳建仁) policy report in protest at his Cabinet’s handling of food safety issues, with reports of heated arguments on the floor between some of the new lawmakers.
Knowing their best shot at influence is through a tepid alliance with the KMT, the Taiwan People’s Party’s (TPP) eight lawmakers have sided with its calls for reform and backed its members for legislative speaker and committee chairs. After a noisy campaign, the party seems content for the moment to be a quiet kingmaker, ready to side with either of the major parties as it sees fit.
On the other side of the aisle, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been amplifying its message of internationalism. A total of 31 interparliamentary friendship groups have been established since the new session began, with the vast majority chaired by DPP members, and features strategic alliances such as with other Austronesian-language and New Southbound Policy countries. Many have been announced through enthusiastic news conferences, with speeches given by DPP lawmakers and foreign representatives, seeking to solidify the party’s status as the internationally savvy choice.
It is astute to do so, as legislature-to-legislature cooperation is an important bedrock of Taiwan’s foreign relations in lieu of formal diplomatic ties. If KMT leadership were paying attention, they would be seeking to wrest that narrative from their opponents. Instead, they seem to have doubled down on the China-friendly stance and the disruptive antics that lost them the past three presidential elections, even sending KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) to China once again for a photo op with Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤).
The KMT seems to have realized this particular error, or at least is paying lip service to it.
Parliamentary diplomacy is an important job of the legislature, Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) said earlier this month, vowing to “continue to convey Taiwanese voices” abroad.
Still, the party’s actions seem to indicate that it has not learned any lessons from its latest defeat. Instead of meaningfully engaging in internal reform, it has continued to externalize its problems through flashy antics and a power grab, ignoring strategies that could raise its status as a trusted policymaker and global player.
Even with so many new faces, its voice still sounds the same.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath