The Legislative Yuan began its 11th term on Feb. 1 and its new members have been vying to make a name for themselves. They know they are at an inflection point, which makes for exciting observation.
Of the 113 seats, 54 are held by newcomers voted into office with lofty promises of reform. Their presence alone is enough to make for a volatile first session, but in addition, for the first time since 2004, no party holds an absolute majority.
At best, this would make the legislature a more active marketplace of ideas, as parties need to make a convincing case for their policies to gain traction. At worst, it could lock the legislature into a stalemate.
The three main parties have hit the ground running to set the tone for the first term. Lacking the presidency and grasping legislative power by its fingernails, the main opposition, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), in a strategic move, has chosen to champion oversight reform. Its caucus wants to give lawmakers — read: themselves — the right to conduct investigations, hold hearings and approve appointments to better oversee the Executive Yuan, as well as mandate an annual “state of the nation” address by the president.
Accompanying its calls for procedural reform, the party has continued its trend of oversight through disruption by taking opportunistic advantage of the daily controversy. KMT members were sure to make a scene at the new legislature’s first meeting on Feb. 20 by delaying Premier Chen Chien-jen’s (陳建仁) policy report in protest at his Cabinet’s handling of food safety issues, with reports of heated arguments on the floor between some of the new lawmakers.
Knowing their best shot at influence is through a tepid alliance with the KMT, the Taiwan People’s Party’s (TPP) eight lawmakers have sided with its calls for reform and backed its members for legislative speaker and committee chairs. After a noisy campaign, the party seems content for the moment to be a quiet kingmaker, ready to side with either of the major parties as it sees fit.
On the other side of the aisle, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been amplifying its message of internationalism. A total of 31 interparliamentary friendship groups have been established since the new session began, with the vast majority chaired by DPP members, and features strategic alliances such as with other Austronesian-language and New Southbound Policy countries. Many have been announced through enthusiastic news conferences, with speeches given by DPP lawmakers and foreign representatives, seeking to solidify the party’s status as the internationally savvy choice.
It is astute to do so, as legislature-to-legislature cooperation is an important bedrock of Taiwan’s foreign relations in lieu of formal diplomatic ties. If KMT leadership were paying attention, they would be seeking to wrest that narrative from their opponents. Instead, they seem to have doubled down on the China-friendly stance and the disruptive antics that lost them the past three presidential elections, even sending KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) to China once again for a photo op with Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤).
The KMT seems to have realized this particular error, or at least is paying lip service to it.
Parliamentary diplomacy is an important job of the legislature, Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) said earlier this month, vowing to “continue to convey Taiwanese voices” abroad.
Still, the party’s actions seem to indicate that it has not learned any lessons from its latest defeat. Instead of meaningfully engaging in internal reform, it has continued to externalize its problems through flashy antics and a power grab, ignoring strategies that could raise its status as a trusted policymaker and global player.
Even with so many new faces, its voice still sounds the same.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press