No dystopian picture of a climate-ruined planet is complete until you have been put off your lunch.
Whether it is the grubs farmed by Dave Bautista in Blade Runner: 2049 or Charlton Heston in Soylent Green yelling that food is being made from “people,” there are few things that provoke as visceral a reaction as the prospect that ecological disaster might force you to eat something gross.
It Is hardly surprising, then, if we are regularly promised a future of Blade Runner-style protein farms, where insect larvae are bred en masse for human consumption. “STOP insect flour-based foods in school canteens,” Italian deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini wrote in an X posting last month, echoing a trope that has found currency among the country’s farm protestors.
Illustration: Tania Chou
Not everyone sees this future as a grim one — indeed, for some, it looks more like a utopia. Insects are highly efficient at converting waste matter into high-quality protein, making their consumption a potentially more sustainable way to feed a planet approaching 10 billion people.
New York-based chef Joseph Yoon promotes entomophagy with gourmet dishes such as scorpion rice balls and ant guacamole, while The Economist has been pushing the virtues of bugmeat for so long that it is starting to look like a running joke. “Edible insects can play a vital role in the global food system,” said the authors of a paper last week in Scientific Reports, compiling a list of 2,205 insect species eaten across the world.
The more realistic picture of the future is neither dystopia nor utopia, however — and it is not going to lead to us eating less chicken, pork and beef, either. If anything, the most likely future for insect farming is one where it accelerates humanity’s growing appetite for poultry and mammal flesh, rather than reducing it.
That is because insects are best suited to solving a problem the livestock industry has been struggling with for decades — the protein deficit. Intensive farming depends on getting animals to grow faster, and that requires levels of protein that are rarely found in their natural diets.
Soybeans are not a top-four global crop because of all the edamame, tofu and dairy-free lattes we consume, but because the soymeal left over after oil is squeezed out is about half protein, making it an excellent additive to animal feed. Such protein-rich feed cakes are also one of the main byproducts of the corn ethanol industry.
That is not the half of it. Indeed, a history of the things used to bulk up livestock over the years provides enough horror stories to fill a Black Mirror season.
Chicken manure is a routine high-protein feed ingredient in much of the world, including the US. So is fishmeal, made from rendering fish too small for human consumption into powder. There have even been multiple stomach-churning experiments looking at whether cattle could be fed with their own dung.
Indeed, insect farming would be having a much easier time of things right now if previous attempts to solve the protein deficit had not led to disaster. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy, the brain-wasting condition known as mad-cow disease, appears to have emerged in the UK in the 1980s because cattle were being fed meat and bone meal, another protein-rich feed enhancer. That infected them with scrapie, a degenerative disease present in the brain tissue of the sheep being ground into meal. The resulting public-health emergency led to tighter regulation of the animal-feed chain, so these days the controls are almost as tight as those on human food.
It is the growing awareness of the climate impact of farming that is starting to change that, as well as provoking those protests in Italy and across Europe, many of which are in opposition to increased environmental regulation of agriculture. Emissions from livestock amount to about 3.5 billion metric tonnes a year, equivalent to total climate pollution from the EU and Canada put together. Better management of animal waste — such as feeding manure to insect larvae, which could then be turned into nutritious feed — could play a major role in reducing that burden.
Those hoping that human entomophagy will lead to more sustainable global food systems should be careful what they wish for: The ecologically minded push to include more grubs in human diets is going hand-in-hand with a more hard-headed drive to allow them back into feed troughs, too. The EU allowed insects to be fed to fish in 2017 and to chickens and pigs in 2021.
Horrible food is such a sci-fi staple because people are fussy eaters — one reason that insect farming so far is mostly serving the needs of grub-eating pets, as Bloomberg News reported last month. However, farm animals do not get a choice about their lunch.
If feed pellets made from fly larvae, crickets and mealworms succeed in lowering the cost of producing poultry and livestock meat, it is going to make such products more affordable and increase global consumption. That is unlikely to be a win in climate terms, no matter how efficiently we bulk up our farm animals.
If you are looking for a diet with a lower carbon footprint, you would be better off giving up meat altogether.
David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. Previously, he worked for Bloomberg News, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS