This is the Year of the Dragon. At the beginning of the year, the Chinese government announced that “dragon” is to be translated as long (龍), in a move meant to erase the supposed negative connotations of dragons.
In many Western cultures, dragons are often seen as wicked or demonic.
This is not just a mere linguistic adjustment. It is symbolic, representing a change in China’s current political culture.
Under the overbearing leadership of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the Chinese government has been undergoing a cultural policy of “de-Westernization.”
Although this change in semantics is just one of many examples, it has garnered a lot of attention from the global community.
Xi is pushing forward with the economic policy of “building a nest to attract a phoenix and emptying the cage to switch out the birds.”
This is his attempt at reducing global downturns and economic reliance on Western nations. However, the result leaves much to be desired.
Xi’s ethno-nationalistic policy of “de-Westernization” has brought about changes such as banning foreign names and restricting foreign holidays and celebrations.
These measures are meant to isolate it, gradually sealing the country off from the international community.
China is not stopping at “de-Westernization” either. Changes are also happening in its religious policies.
It has moved away from its previous stance of relative tolerance of “sinicized religion,” and now leans toward “secularization” under communistic atheism.
This has led to the suppression of religious groups — such as Buddhists, Catholics, Protestants and Muslims — and have drawn domestic and foreign attention.
These policy changes could lead to conflict between China and religious countries.
Taiwan has also been affected by China’s cultural policies, especially the younger generation.
Although the government has been promoting its “Bilingual by 2030” policy, which aims to increase the country’s international integration, it is difficult for Taiwanese to avoid China’s infiltration through media such as Douyin and Xiaohongshu.
Taiwan must be more vigilant. It must avoid being entangled in Beijing’s fabricated “Chinese culture” trap.
President-elect William Lai’s (賴清德) proposed NT$10 billion (US$316.69 million) “foreign study dream fund” is a step in the right direction. However, rules must be in place to make sure it will not be monopolized by a select few.
China’s cultural policies have domestic and international effects.
Taiwan must continue to be vigilant, hold on to its own cultural values and avoid being manipulated by Chinese political forces.
The international community must also pay attention to China’s suppression of cultures and religions, as well as its infringement on human rights.
We must protect the diversity of human cultures and religious freedom.
Gong Lin-dong is a research fellow who focuses on the Chinese Communist Party.
Translated by Tim Smith
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
RSS