This is the Year of the Dragon. At the beginning of the year, the Chinese government announced that “dragon” is to be translated as long (龍), in a move meant to erase the supposed negative connotations of dragons.
In many Western cultures, dragons are often seen as wicked or demonic.
This is not just a mere linguistic adjustment. It is symbolic, representing a change in China’s current political culture.
Under the overbearing leadership of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the Chinese government has been undergoing a cultural policy of “de-Westernization.”
Although this change in semantics is just one of many examples, it has garnered a lot of attention from the global community.
Xi is pushing forward with the economic policy of “building a nest to attract a phoenix and emptying the cage to switch out the birds.”
This is his attempt at reducing global downturns and economic reliance on Western nations. However, the result leaves much to be desired.
Xi’s ethno-nationalistic policy of “de-Westernization” has brought about changes such as banning foreign names and restricting foreign holidays and celebrations.
These measures are meant to isolate it, gradually sealing the country off from the international community.
China is not stopping at “de-Westernization” either. Changes are also happening in its religious policies.
It has moved away from its previous stance of relative tolerance of “sinicized religion,” and now leans toward “secularization” under communistic atheism.
This has led to the suppression of religious groups — such as Buddhists, Catholics, Protestants and Muslims — and have drawn domestic and foreign attention.
These policy changes could lead to conflict between China and religious countries.
Taiwan has also been affected by China’s cultural policies, especially the younger generation.
Although the government has been promoting its “Bilingual by 2030” policy, which aims to increase the country’s international integration, it is difficult for Taiwanese to avoid China’s infiltration through media such as Douyin and Xiaohongshu.
Taiwan must be more vigilant. It must avoid being entangled in Beijing’s fabricated “Chinese culture” trap.
President-elect William Lai’s (賴清德) proposed NT$10 billion (US$316.69 million) “foreign study dream fund” is a step in the right direction. However, rules must be in place to make sure it will not be monopolized by a select few.
China’s cultural policies have domestic and international effects.
Taiwan must continue to be vigilant, hold on to its own cultural values and avoid being manipulated by Chinese political forces.
The international community must also pay attention to China’s suppression of cultures and religions, as well as its infringement on human rights.
We must protect the diversity of human cultures and religious freedom.
Gong Lin-dong is a research fellow who focuses on the Chinese Communist Party.
Translated by Tim Smith
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS