A new exhibition at the National Museum of Taiwan History in Tainan, “Transcending 1624 — Taiwan and the World,” which opened on Feb. 1, offers a rich and evocative interpretation of Taiwanese history. It begins with the question: “How should 1624 be viewed from 2024?”
It was the year Dutch traders landed on Taiwan’s shores, marking the “integration of Taiwan into the Asian-European trade network,” the exhibition said. The 17th century was when “Taiwan became connected to the rest of the world,” the museum added.
The motif of the exhibition is trade, commerce, cultural exchange, assimilation and adoption. In a word: openness.
Although billed as “Taiwan and the world,” the exhibition is about the world coming to Taiwan, to those in Taiwan at the time and how these interactions and exchanges shaped what Taiwan is today.
The exhibition is pedagogical, but not insistently so — visitors are invited to participate in a journey of discovery and to think about Taiwan, its past and its place in the world. It is an exhibition only possible after the nation’s democratization as the orientation of the exhibition is Taiwan, centering on the place and its people.
This would have been unthinkable during the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) dominated period, where Taiwan was “hollowed out” in the state’s historical narrative and people were told that the single orienting principle of Taiwanese history was Chinese imperial history.
This is not so in this exhibition. China is just one of multiple empires, including the Portuguese, Dutch, Spanish, British and Japanese, who have turned up on the nation’s shores.
As the academics Steven Lavine and Ivan Karp write in their book Exhibiting Cultures: “Every museum exhibition, whatever its overt subject, inevitably draws on the cultural assumptions and resources of the people who make it.”
Today, the museum draws upon the democratic and globalized ethos of the post-authoritarian and post-Chinese nationalist era. This is an exhibition that is of and for Taiwanese.
Although not explicitly stated, the visitor is left to contemplate the implication of a maritime Taiwan, a Taiwan connected to the world through commerce and exchange. As the military historian Sarah Paine says, throughout global history, maritime powers, like the Dutch, British and the US after World War II, have focused on expanding trade and openness, and in building a universal system of laws so they could trade in safety. On the other hand, continental empires, vulnerable to land invasion and viewing the domination of territory as the primary means to security, prioritized territory over trade expansion, and focused on “carving the world up into spheres of influence, each a legal world unto itself, and often fighting to expand at each other’s expense.”
We live in an era when the open, maritime order built by the allies after World War II is coming under great threat by a resurgence of continental powers like Russia and China. “1624” asks us which order Taiwan is more naturally a part of.
“Nothing of great significance happened in 1587,” the historian Ray Huang wrote in 1587: A Year of No Significance, but in his pen portrait of the Ming court, he shows an empire slowly decaying. Its collapse in 1644 ushered in the expansive continental empire of the Qing Dynasty, altering Chinese history forever. 1587, while a year of no great significance, paradoxically, was a portent of momentous change.
So, too, with Taiwan’s 1624, the year that Dutch seafarers arrived, two decades before the Ming’s collapse. Linking with the world and forging a diverse island culture, the nation began a maritime journey that it still charts today. 1624, this exhibition says, was a year of great significance.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS