A new exhibition at the National Museum of Taiwan History in Tainan, “Transcending 1624 — Taiwan and the World,” which opened on Feb. 1, offers a rich and evocative interpretation of Taiwanese history. It begins with the question: “How should 1624 be viewed from 2024?”
It was the year Dutch traders landed on Taiwan’s shores, marking the “integration of Taiwan into the Asian-European trade network,” the exhibition said. The 17th century was when “Taiwan became connected to the rest of the world,” the museum added.
The motif of the exhibition is trade, commerce, cultural exchange, assimilation and adoption. In a word: openness.
Although billed as “Taiwan and the world,” the exhibition is about the world coming to Taiwan, to those in Taiwan at the time and how these interactions and exchanges shaped what Taiwan is today.
The exhibition is pedagogical, but not insistently so — visitors are invited to participate in a journey of discovery and to think about Taiwan, its past and its place in the world. It is an exhibition only possible after the nation’s democratization as the orientation of the exhibition is Taiwan, centering on the place and its people.
This would have been unthinkable during the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) dominated period, where Taiwan was “hollowed out” in the state’s historical narrative and people were told that the single orienting principle of Taiwanese history was Chinese imperial history.
This is not so in this exhibition. China is just one of multiple empires, including the Portuguese, Dutch, Spanish, British and Japanese, who have turned up on the nation’s shores.
As the academics Steven Lavine and Ivan Karp write in their book Exhibiting Cultures: “Every museum exhibition, whatever its overt subject, inevitably draws on the cultural assumptions and resources of the people who make it.”
Today, the museum draws upon the democratic and globalized ethos of the post-authoritarian and post-Chinese nationalist era. This is an exhibition that is of and for Taiwanese.
Although not explicitly stated, the visitor is left to contemplate the implication of a maritime Taiwan, a Taiwan connected to the world through commerce and exchange. As the military historian Sarah Paine says, throughout global history, maritime powers, like the Dutch, British and the US after World War II, have focused on expanding trade and openness, and in building a universal system of laws so they could trade in safety. On the other hand, continental empires, vulnerable to land invasion and viewing the domination of territory as the primary means to security, prioritized territory over trade expansion, and focused on “carving the world up into spheres of influence, each a legal world unto itself, and often fighting to expand at each other’s expense.”
We live in an era when the open, maritime order built by the allies after World War II is coming under great threat by a resurgence of continental powers like Russia and China. “1624” asks us which order Taiwan is more naturally a part of.
“Nothing of great significance happened in 1587,” the historian Ray Huang wrote in 1587: A Year of No Significance, but in his pen portrait of the Ming court, he shows an empire slowly decaying. Its collapse in 1644 ushered in the expansive continental empire of the Qing Dynasty, altering Chinese history forever. 1587, while a year of no great significance, paradoxically, was a portent of momentous change.
So, too, with Taiwan’s 1624, the year that Dutch seafarers arrived, two decades before the Ming’s collapse. Linking with the world and forging a diverse island culture, the nation began a maritime journey that it still charts today. 1624, this exhibition says, was a year of great significance.
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS