A new exhibition at the National Museum of Taiwan History in Tainan, “Transcending 1624 — Taiwan and the World,” which opened on Feb. 1, offers a rich and evocative interpretation of Taiwanese history. It begins with the question: “How should 1624 be viewed from 2024?”
It was the year Dutch traders landed on Taiwan’s shores, marking the “integration of Taiwan into the Asian-European trade network,” the exhibition said. The 17th century was when “Taiwan became connected to the rest of the world,” the museum added.
The motif of the exhibition is trade, commerce, cultural exchange, assimilation and adoption. In a word: openness.
Although billed as “Taiwan and the world,” the exhibition is about the world coming to Taiwan, to those in Taiwan at the time and how these interactions and exchanges shaped what Taiwan is today.
The exhibition is pedagogical, but not insistently so — visitors are invited to participate in a journey of discovery and to think about Taiwan, its past and its place in the world. It is an exhibition only possible after the nation’s democratization as the orientation of the exhibition is Taiwan, centering on the place and its people.
This would have been unthinkable during the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) dominated period, where Taiwan was “hollowed out” in the state’s historical narrative and people were told that the single orienting principle of Taiwanese history was Chinese imperial history.
This is not so in this exhibition. China is just one of multiple empires, including the Portuguese, Dutch, Spanish, British and Japanese, who have turned up on the nation’s shores.
As the academics Steven Lavine and Ivan Karp write in their book Exhibiting Cultures: “Every museum exhibition, whatever its overt subject, inevitably draws on the cultural assumptions and resources of the people who make it.”
Today, the museum draws upon the democratic and globalized ethos of the post-authoritarian and post-Chinese nationalist era. This is an exhibition that is of and for Taiwanese.
Although not explicitly stated, the visitor is left to contemplate the implication of a maritime Taiwan, a Taiwan connected to the world through commerce and exchange. As the military historian Sarah Paine says, throughout global history, maritime powers, like the Dutch, British and the US after World War II, have focused on expanding trade and openness, and in building a universal system of laws so they could trade in safety. On the other hand, continental empires, vulnerable to land invasion and viewing the domination of territory as the primary means to security, prioritized territory over trade expansion, and focused on “carving the world up into spheres of influence, each a legal world unto itself, and often fighting to expand at each other’s expense.”
We live in an era when the open, maritime order built by the allies after World War II is coming under great threat by a resurgence of continental powers like Russia and China. “1624” asks us which order Taiwan is more naturally a part of.
“Nothing of great significance happened in 1587,” the historian Ray Huang wrote in 1587: A Year of No Significance, but in his pen portrait of the Ming court, he shows an empire slowly decaying. Its collapse in 1644 ushered in the expansive continental empire of the Qing Dynasty, altering Chinese history forever. 1587, while a year of no great significance, paradoxically, was a portent of momentous change.
So, too, with Taiwan’s 1624, the year that Dutch seafarers arrived, two decades before the Ming’s collapse. Linking with the world and forging a diverse island culture, the nation began a maritime journey that it still charts today. 1624, this exhibition says, was a year of great significance.
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS