State of nation tactics
None of the three parties in the new legislature have more than half of the total seats. With the new legislative session about to begin, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of the pan-blue camp and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) of the white camp have been sharpening their knives.
For the KMT, caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) said he would push for the normalization of a presidential state of the nation address to the legislature and seek amendments to compel the president to answer questions from lawmakers.
TPP secretary-general Wu Chun-cheng (吳春城) agreed, saying that it would be “the sooner the better” for a rule change and that the state of the nation address should be a “question and answer” session to prevent the president from evading accountability.
KMT Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) demanded that president-elect William Lai (賴清德) “answer all the questions, and answer them truthfully” after he takes office as president on May 20 following his election victory with the Democratic Progressive Party last month.
The Legislative Yuan — which is the highest organ of public opinion in Taiwan — is responsible for monitoring the government.
This is indeed in line with the operation of a democratic constitutional system.
However, under the “five power” Constitution, the highest organ of the administrative branch is the Executive Yuan, with the Legislative Yuan and Executive Yuan on the same level.
Although the Constitution clearly and definitively states that the premier and his Cabinet members should face questions from the legislature, there is no legal basis for the opposition camp to demand that the president be subjected to such a process as well.
Before an amendment is passed, it should remain a constitutional norm for the legislature to be limited to questioning the premier and Cabinet members.
The opposition camp’s demand for an “impromptu” session of “answering all the questions and answering them truthfully” is at best a disguised threat or an insult to the president.
Moreover, given the uneven quality, knowledge and cultivation of legislators, they would be unable to put aside their resentments —be they personal or because of their party — during a question-and-answer session.
If the lawmakers are unable to ask meaningful questions, how can they expect the president to answer them truthfully?
If the pan-blue and white camps continue to play tricks, it might even trigger public protests.
Tien Fong-wen
Taipei
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS