As Taiwan’s political parties prepare for next month’s election of a new legislative speaker, incoming Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator-at-large Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) says that one of his reasons for seeking the post is to keep an eye on the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s corruption. Han accused the DPP government of corruption when he ran for president in 2020 and again when he was supporting New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi’s (侯友宜) presidential bid this month, and he is still saying the same thing.
The speaker and deputy speaker of the Legislative Yuan are supposed to be administratively neutral, so any legislator who wants to supervise the DPP government had better not serve in those roles.
This is precisely why Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), who has declared his intention to strictly supervise the ruling party, said that he would not stand for election to either of these posts.
Evidently, the accusations of DPP government corruption that slip so easily off Han’s tongue are just populist rhetoric. Han often tells voters that the DPP is corrupt, but how does this measure up against the facts?
During the presidential campaign, Han and Hou’s campaign headquarters accused the DPP of major corruption in two government procurement cases, namely that of COVID-19 vaccines made by Taiwan’s Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corp and that of eggs imported to relieve a domestic shortage.
However, although prosecutors have handled 62 cases concerning the Medigen vaccine, they concluded that there were no unlawful activities involved. They also found no evidence of corruption or other unlawful activity in relation to the egg imports.
In contrast, a KMT staffer concocted bogus “death threats” related to the egg imports, arousing public suspicions that the KMT was not acting in good faith.
These examples illustrate how the accusations that Han and other opposition party figures make about DPP corruption are no more than populist verbiage.
Of course, there is such a thing as corruption by governing parties, even in democratic nations. For example, it happened when Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), now chairman of the TPP, was mayor of Taipei, and also in some cases where the DPP was in office.
However, when it comes to the degree of corruption, neither of these parties compare to the KMT.
For example, former Nantou County commissioner Lee Chao-ching (李朝卿) of the KMT was convicted of taking more than 120 kickbacks between 2008 and 2012, mostly for post-typhoon reconstruction projects. Lee received prison sentences adding up to more than 400 years, to be served concurrently for 16 years and six months.
In Taiwan, if you say that a certain political party is corrupt, such a comment is regarded as free speech that is open to public discussion. That being the case, the party that has been accused of corruption cannot sue the accuser for defamation.
Consequently, this kind of rhetoric is often used by populists who want to attack their enemies without being held legally responsible.
Han’s mantra of claiming that the DPP’s corruption is serious is typical of how some politicians attack opposing political parties in Taiwan’s populist political environment.
Liu Shih-ming is an adjunct associate professor in the Graduate School of Taiwanese Culture at National Taipei University of Education.
Translated by Julian Clegg
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS