As Taiwan’s political parties prepare for next month’s election of a new legislative speaker, incoming Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator-at-large Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) says that one of his reasons for seeking the post is to keep an eye on the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s corruption. Han accused the DPP government of corruption when he ran for president in 2020 and again when he was supporting New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi’s (侯友宜) presidential bid this month, and he is still saying the same thing.
The speaker and deputy speaker of the Legislative Yuan are supposed to be administratively neutral, so any legislator who wants to supervise the DPP government had better not serve in those roles.
This is precisely why Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), who has declared his intention to strictly supervise the ruling party, said that he would not stand for election to either of these posts.
Evidently, the accusations of DPP government corruption that slip so easily off Han’s tongue are just populist rhetoric. Han often tells voters that the DPP is corrupt, but how does this measure up against the facts?
During the presidential campaign, Han and Hou’s campaign headquarters accused the DPP of major corruption in two government procurement cases, namely that of COVID-19 vaccines made by Taiwan’s Medigen Vaccine Biologics Corp and that of eggs imported to relieve a domestic shortage.
However, although prosecutors have handled 62 cases concerning the Medigen vaccine, they concluded that there were no unlawful activities involved. They also found no evidence of corruption or other unlawful activity in relation to the egg imports.
In contrast, a KMT staffer concocted bogus “death threats” related to the egg imports, arousing public suspicions that the KMT was not acting in good faith.
These examples illustrate how the accusations that Han and other opposition party figures make about DPP corruption are no more than populist verbiage.
Of course, there is such a thing as corruption by governing parties, even in democratic nations. For example, it happened when Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), now chairman of the TPP, was mayor of Taipei, and also in some cases where the DPP was in office.
However, when it comes to the degree of corruption, neither of these parties compare to the KMT.
For example, former Nantou County commissioner Lee Chao-ching (李朝卿) of the KMT was convicted of taking more than 120 kickbacks between 2008 and 2012, mostly for post-typhoon reconstruction projects. Lee received prison sentences adding up to more than 400 years, to be served concurrently for 16 years and six months.
In Taiwan, if you say that a certain political party is corrupt, such a comment is regarded as free speech that is open to public discussion. That being the case, the party that has been accused of corruption cannot sue the accuser for defamation.
Consequently, this kind of rhetoric is often used by populists who want to attack their enemies without being held legally responsible.
Han’s mantra of claiming that the DPP’s corruption is serious is typical of how some politicians attack opposing political parties in Taiwan’s populist political environment.
Liu Shih-ming is an adjunct associate professor in the Graduate School of Taiwanese Culture at National Taipei University of Education.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises