With Taiwan’s presidential election fast approaching, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) released a campaign advertisement for its presidential candidate Vice President William Lai (賴清德) and his running mate Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴). The ad, on the theme of “On the Road,” has been viewed and “liked” by a huge number of people across various social media platforms.
The video starts with Lai and outgoing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) traveling in a car, with Tsai at the wheel, talking about their cooperation in government over the past few years. After a while the car stops, Tsai gets out and in steps Hsiao, as Lai takes the wheel. After Tsai bids them farewell, Lai and Hsiao drive off, while talking about what direction they should take from now on.
In an atmosphere of strictly one-or-the-other ideologies generating various kinds of political hate speech, the campaign video presents a contrasting ambience. The lighting, composition and imagery are all gentle, as is the tone of the conversations, in which the main points are made.
“Recruit outstanding talents from various fields to join the legislature,” “do not be careless about choosing a deputy,” “the most important thing is to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy.” “We will follow the path of democracy forever.” These excerpts from the dialogue all typify the DPP’s consistent style of governance.
A couple of days ago I had a conversation with an elder figure in the field of politics. Regarding the prospects for Taiwan’s presidential election during the final countdown to election day, he was of the opinion that Taiwan People’s Party presidential candidate Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) lack of core principles might cause voters who were originally inclined to vote for him to cast their ballots for the “blue” Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the “green” DPP instead. He said that the way those votes go will be the key factor that decides which of those two parties wins the elections. He also said that some unexpected incident might cause the votes to go one way or another.
That might be true, but I would also say that we must not overlook the trends among Taiwan’s swing voters. At the same time, among those voters who are defined as “deep blue” or “deep green,” the key question is whether they can exercise independent critical thinking in choosing how to cast their votes, and especially whether the fans of former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), who stood unsuccessfully as the KMT’s presidential candidate in 2020, could realize how they have been turned into electoral tools by the KMT.
Another statement made in the DPP ad is: “If you go abroad, you will see how far ahead Taiwan really is among countries.”
Taiwan is also a real model of democracy for the world’s ethnic Chinese. This country has plenty of room for diversity and it strives for peace, democracy and progress. That is something that cannot be achieved by the Chinese Communist Party, which worships dictators and autocrats, and has often engaged in violent internal struggles.
Knight Chang is a political worker and doctor of education.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS