Imagine driving in the outside lane only to suddenly realize that it had become a left-turn-only lane. You want to move to the right lane, but vehicles block your way. You have to stay in the left lane, but if caught, you could be fined. Now picture yourself riding a scooter. Some cars stop ahead of you. You cross the double white line while passing the vehicles. If caught, you could receive a traffic ticket.
Here are a few more scenarios: You stop your car temporarily to unload some goods or pick someone up. You could be fined for parking at the red lines.
You accidentally exceed the speed limit while driving on a wide downhill road. It is captured by traffic cameras and you get fined.
When you return home at night, you leave your car in an area for temporary parking. Even without disturbing anyone, you could be fined for illegal parking.
If you turn on your car’s underglow lighting by accident, you might be fined.
In some places, traffic signs can be unclear or ambiguous, but you might break the rules and receive a traffic ticket simply for turning left or right. At the same time, many unreasonable people who — either for no good reason or with vicious intent — like to report traffic infractions.
In densely populated Taiwan, those who drive a car or ride a scooter must have received at least one traffic ticket.
How do agencies distribute and use the revenue that comes from traffic fines? The local governments where the traffic contraventions occur receive 75 percent of the revenue from fines, while law enforcement agencies get 24 percent. Only 1 percent is allocated to the national treasury.
In other words, local governments are the major beneficiaries of traffic fines.
However, the public tends to blame the central government and the ruling party for traffic fines. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a good record on governance, it has suffered two consecutive major setbacks in local elections. Perhaps it has something to do with traffic tickets and fines.
My job requires me to drive to work every day. For almost three decades, I have been a law-abiding driver, but in Taiwan, it is easy for a driver to receive traffic tickets.
In 2016, people reported 1.53 million cases of traffic contraventions. Last year, that number reached 7 million.
When local governments make their annual budgets, traffic fines are considered a significant source of revenue.
For example, in 2018, the administration of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) forecast about NT$480 million (US$15.47 million) in revenue to come from traffic fines.
Since then, that figure has drastically increased. From 2020 onward, the Taichung City Government expected to receive NT$1.58 billion in revenue from traffic fines. As it turned out, the city has received more than NT$2 billion from traffic fines for three consecutive years. Last year, that revenue was nearly NT$3 billion, almost twice the expected amount.
Taichung is not the only example. This is happening in other local governments as well.
However, local governments are not for-profit organizations. Is it appropriate for them to consider traffic fines an expected part of their budgets? In doing so, local governments are essentially targeting vehicle users, waiting for them to break the law, while drivers and scooter riders are becoming ATMs for governments.
Moreover, is it appropriate for people who are not law enforcement officers to report traffic contraventions? Dashboard cameras are intended to protect drivers, providing evidence when traffic disputes occur. Now, dashcam videos are often used to report drivers, which should be the work and responsibility of the police, not civilians.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications should define clearer rules concerning traffic tickets and fines. Amendments should be made if necessary. If further regulations regarding the usage of traffic fines are needed, the ministry should create them. Central and local governments should work together and agree on those terms.
Drivers should not be considered cash cows for local governments.
It is fortunate that DPP legislative candidate Wang Yi-chuan (王義川), a popular TV political pundit and chief strategist at the Taiwan Thinktank, is a specialist in traffic matters. Wang has proposed revising traffic reporting regulations and policy, suggesting that road users’ experiences should be considered when formulating traffic laws.
In this way, traffic rules can be more grounded and reasonably implemented. This is the change that many drivers want to see.
Traffic policy should be aimed at enhancing road safety. Traffic tickets should only be issued when necessary, and fines should not be considered as an official agency’s major source of revenue. Resentment from drivers would only increase if they are treated unfairly.
Lin Chin-kuo is a business manager at a technology company.
Translated by Emma Liu
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS