Imagine driving in the outside lane only to suddenly realize that it had become a left-turn-only lane. You want to move to the right lane, but vehicles block your way. You have to stay in the left lane, but if caught, you could be fined. Now picture yourself riding a scooter. Some cars stop ahead of you. You cross the double white line while passing the vehicles. If caught, you could receive a traffic ticket.
Here are a few more scenarios: You stop your car temporarily to unload some goods or pick someone up. You could be fined for parking at the red lines.
You accidentally exceed the speed limit while driving on a wide downhill road. It is captured by traffic cameras and you get fined.
When you return home at night, you leave your car in an area for temporary parking. Even without disturbing anyone, you could be fined for illegal parking.
If you turn on your car’s underglow lighting by accident, you might be fined.
In some places, traffic signs can be unclear or ambiguous, but you might break the rules and receive a traffic ticket simply for turning left or right. At the same time, many unreasonable people who — either for no good reason or with vicious intent — like to report traffic infractions.
In densely populated Taiwan, those who drive a car or ride a scooter must have received at least one traffic ticket.
How do agencies distribute and use the revenue that comes from traffic fines? The local governments where the traffic contraventions occur receive 75 percent of the revenue from fines, while law enforcement agencies get 24 percent. Only 1 percent is allocated to the national treasury.
In other words, local governments are the major beneficiaries of traffic fines.
However, the public tends to blame the central government and the ruling party for traffic fines. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a good record on governance, it has suffered two consecutive major setbacks in local elections. Perhaps it has something to do with traffic tickets and fines.
My job requires me to drive to work every day. For almost three decades, I have been a law-abiding driver, but in Taiwan, it is easy for a driver to receive traffic tickets.
In 2016, people reported 1.53 million cases of traffic contraventions. Last year, that number reached 7 million.
When local governments make their annual budgets, traffic fines are considered a significant source of revenue.
For example, in 2018, the administration of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) forecast about NT$480 million (US$15.47 million) in revenue to come from traffic fines.
Since then, that figure has drastically increased. From 2020 onward, the Taichung City Government expected to receive NT$1.58 billion in revenue from traffic fines. As it turned out, the city has received more than NT$2 billion from traffic fines for three consecutive years. Last year, that revenue was nearly NT$3 billion, almost twice the expected amount.
Taichung is not the only example. This is happening in other local governments as well.
However, local governments are not for-profit organizations. Is it appropriate for them to consider traffic fines an expected part of their budgets? In doing so, local governments are essentially targeting vehicle users, waiting for them to break the law, while drivers and scooter riders are becoming ATMs for governments.
Moreover, is it appropriate for people who are not law enforcement officers to report traffic contraventions? Dashboard cameras are intended to protect drivers, providing evidence when traffic disputes occur. Now, dashcam videos are often used to report drivers, which should be the work and responsibility of the police, not civilians.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications should define clearer rules concerning traffic tickets and fines. Amendments should be made if necessary. If further regulations regarding the usage of traffic fines are needed, the ministry should create them. Central and local governments should work together and agree on those terms.
Drivers should not be considered cash cows for local governments.
It is fortunate that DPP legislative candidate Wang Yi-chuan (王義川), a popular TV political pundit and chief strategist at the Taiwan Thinktank, is a specialist in traffic matters. Wang has proposed revising traffic reporting regulations and policy, suggesting that road users’ experiences should be considered when formulating traffic laws.
In this way, traffic rules can be more grounded and reasonably implemented. This is the change that many drivers want to see.
Traffic policy should be aimed at enhancing road safety. Traffic tickets should only be issued when necessary, and fines should not be considered as an official agency’s major source of revenue. Resentment from drivers would only increase if they are treated unfairly.
Lin Chin-kuo is a business manager at a technology company.
Translated by Emma Liu
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS