New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, said in an interview published, that, if elected, he would refurbish the nation’s three nuclear power plants to extend their operating life, and have top nuclear safety experts examine the mothballed Fourth Nuclear Power Plant to determine if it could be activated. Nuclear waste disposal would not be a problem, as many other countries have addressed it and the government would develop a long-term disposal solution, he said.
Taiwan People’s Party Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) expressed a similar view in a televised policy presentation last week, but only proposed extending the life of two of the nuclear power stations.
In contrast, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) presidential candidate, proposed letting the nuclear power plants be decommissioned on schedule, and said he would not seek to start the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, based on the results of a 2021 referendum in which voters rejected its activation.
The nation’s first two nuclear power plants are in New Taipei City. The two reactors of the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in Shihmen District (石門) were decommissioned in 2018 and 2019, while the operating license for the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in Wanli District (萬里) expired in March last year and is being decommissioned. Meanwhile, the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County is to be decommissioned next year.
Hou’s and Ko’s views on nuclear power have drastically changed over the past few years. Hou has said he never opposed nuclear power, only that he insisted that plants be safely operated. He previously said that high-level waste cannot be kept in New Taipei City forever and that waste disposal and safety issues had not been solved. Now he is casually promising safety even before a review or overhaul of the nuclear power plants, while assuring voters that spent nuclear fuel would be safely disposed.
Meanwhile, Ko said he has changed positions on the issue amid concerns that industries would not have sufficient power under the government’s 2050 net zero emissions plan. In May 2021, he said he opposed trying to bring the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant online, as no one could say how to properly dispose of nuclear waste, nor could anyone create a proper nuclear accident evacuation plan. Taiwan might be destroyed in a nuclear accident, he said. Now he says that people must accept the risks of nuclear power as a trade-off for having relatively clean and inexpensive energy.
Hou’s running mate, Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), went so far as to claim that the nation’s nuclear power plants could be upgraded to accommodate 16 reactors, adding that Taiwan could dispose of its waste the same as other countries such as the US. Jaw fails to acknowledge that the US has no permanent disposal facility for high-level waste, while Finland last year opened the world’s first long-term nuclear waste repository underground. The deep geological repository is expected to start operations in the mid-2030s. It is uncertain if Taiwan, with its high population density and numerous geologic faults, has suitable locations for disposing of nuclear waste underground.
Although nuclear power and safety are highly technical issues requiring scientific expertise, it is ultimately up to voters to decide who they trust to handle the issue prudently and lead the nation steadily toward a renewable energy transition.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS