The Indonesian government should be deeply concerned about China’s recent military exercises near Taiwan, as they are purportedly intended to send a “warning” to the elected government of Taiwan led by President William Lai (賴清德).
The action is particularly alarming because Taiwan is home to approximately 350,000 Indonesian workers, who are employed in the manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors.
Data from the Taipei Economic and Trade Office in Surabaya show that there are 30,000 Indonesians residing in Taiwan who have married Taiwanese, while 20,000 Indonesians are studying in Taiwan.
The data highlight the importance that Indonesia engages in efforts to prevent zero-sum game scenarios in the Taiwan Strait, which would have severe adverse consequences for Indonesia.
Indonesia, recognized as a diplomatic intermediary in global affairs, has the capability to engage in mediating this potential situation of conflicting interests. Indonesia possesses an abundance of capital due to its highly cordial connections with the two parties.
Indonesia’s commitment to preserving strong relations with China is accompanied by a deep respect for its “one China” policy. Nevertheless, Indonesia is highly proficient in implementing its open and assertive foreign policy. It has an Indonesian Trade and Economic Office in Taipei, which can be considered a de facto Indonesian embassy.
An effective approach for Indonesia to adhere to the “one China” policy is to engage in dialogue, albeit with the need for assertive persuasion.
Nevertheless, this pursuit remains viable due to the explicit declaration made by Lai during his inauguration speech. He affirmed that Taiwan would adhere to the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait, indicating that it would persist with its “peaceful” strategy.
Lai underscored the significance of this approach by emphasizing that “peace is invaluable and warfare yields no victor.”
Lai’s statement can serve as a valuable resource for Indonesia in urging China to abstain from military aggression, which would undoubtedly have severe consequences for all parties involved, including Indonesia. The potential losses resulting from a military annexation are unimaginable.
Indonesia can initiate discourse by highlighting the amicable rapport between Indonesia and China thus far, substantiated by successful collaborations across several domains.
China has emerged as Indonesia’s primary trading partner, with trade value estimated to be US$127 billion this year. China will undoubtedly take into account the advice from Indonesia, its closest ally in Southeast Asia, due to the strong emphasis on the positive relationship between the two countries.
Indonesia can propose constructive dialogue to China, particularly by raising the issue at the ASEAN forum. This is especially important because many citizens of ASEAN members, such as the Philippines, Vietnam and Malaysia, also have a presence in Taiwan. By engaging in dialogue, Indonesia’s message would be impactful and China would be motivated to listen.
China, being concerned about its interests in Southeast Asia, would not want its military activities in the Taiwan Strait to disrupt the region. Regarding other aspects, it is desirable that the situation in the Taiwan Strait remains stable and that China’s sincere commitment to maintaining the current state of affairs can also be achieved.
M. Syaprin Zahidi is a senior lecturer in the Department of International Relations at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang in Malang and is a doctoral student at Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government at the Universiti Utara Malaysia in Kedah state.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS