Last month, popular Taiwanese band Mayday (五月天) held concerts in China, soon followed by allegations that the band lip-synched during their performances. At first, only self-published media raised the issue, but later the Shanghai Municipal Administration of Culture and Tourism investigated it. Then, Chinese state-affiliated media including Xinhua news agency, the People’s Daily and Procuratorial Daily brought it to public attention. Then, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office at a news conference implied that the band should not have set a bad example.
The reason for such an unprecedented investigation by Chinese officials has just become clear. In a Reuters report, two Taiwanese security officials said that the campaign was led by the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Publicity Department to “sway the youth vote” ahead of the presidential and legislative elections on Jan. 13.
Taiwanese intelligence officials said that the Chinese National Radio and Television Administration pressured Mayday to state that Taiwan is a part of China.
The Mayday incident became public less than 20 days before the elections, a reminder of what happened in 2016 to the Taiwanese member of the South Korean pop band Twice, Chou Tzu-yu (周子瑜). In 2016, Chou briefly displayed a Republic of China (ROC) flag on a TV show. Following that, she was banned by a number of programs and her endorsement deals were canceled. Under great pressure, Chou was compelled to recognize the “one China” policy and the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Chou was then framed as a singer who supports Taiwanese independence, and now Mayday has been forced to make a political statement. It is obvious that China is attempting to interfere with the elections. When Mayday did not comply and declare a “one China” stance, the band was accused of lip-synching.
The allegations are unfounded. The CCP treats singers and artists like those in feudal times, while oppressing and manipulating artists who believe in creative freedom.
In addition to Mayday and Chou, Taiwanese pop singers such as Jolin Tsai (蔡依林), Hebe Tian (田馥甄), Lala Hsu (徐佳瑩) and Deserts Chang (張懸) have been labeled “pro-Taiwanese independence” for absurd reasons, and they have been severely criticized by young, jingoistic “little pink” Chinese nationalists on the Internet. Beijing regards anything that goes against Chinese propaganda about its claimed sovereignty as pro-Taiwanese independence. Any singer or artist unwilling to cooperate are subject to attacks on the Internet, and their performance contracts and endorsement deals might be terminated.
The Mayday incident shows how easily people could be suppressed by China’s state apparatus. Nowadays, Beijing does not even have to come up with any excuse to interfere with the elections. It has been trying to push Taiwan into the “one China” trap.
It is not Mayday that has lip-synched. The Chinese government has been lip-synching the songs of “both sides of the Strait are one family” and “taking good care of the Taiwanese” for years. Beijing wants to force singers and artists from Taiwan to perform in accordance with its propaganda, but it will never succeed. Taiwanese singers will never include “1992 consensus” or “one China across the Strait” in their lyrics.
With the ballots in their hands, Taiwanese are to prove again to China that they will never surrender and be subjugated. It is impossible for Taiwanese to abandon democracy and freedom while embracing autocratic China. As Mayday’s lyrics go: “You are what you believe, your insistence makes you what you are.”
Jethro Wang works as a research assistant for a think tank.
Translated by Emma Liu
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS