Human rights in China have deteriorated significantly this year, as the Chinese government has intensified its repression and violations of civil, political, social and cultural rights across the country.
The Chinese government has continued its mass detention, torture and forced labor of an estimated 1 million Uighurs and other Turkic Muslims in the Xinjiang region, in what the former UN high commissioner for human rights has concluded might constitute crimes against humanity.
It has also continued its assault on the rights and freedoms of Hong Kongers, by arresting and prosecuting pro-democracy activists, journalists and lawmakers, and by imposing draconian laws and measures that undermine the rule of law and the territory’s autonomy.
Beijing has tightened its control over information and communication in China by censoring and blocking any content that criticizes or challenges its policies and actions, and by harassing and detaining online activists, bloggers and whistle-blowers.
The Chinese government has increased its repression and violations of the civil, political, social and cultural rights of Tibetans. A report by the UN Human Rights Office said that about 1 million Tibetan children were separated from their families and forced to attend residential schools that aimed to assimilate them into the dominant Han culture, language and ideology.
The report also said that the Chinese government interfered with the religious and cultural practices of the Tibetans and restricted their freedom of expression, association, and movement. Other sources have also documented continued human rights abuses in Tibet, such as the destruction of religious and cultural sites, torture and detentions, and coerced abortions or forced sterilizations.
The Chinese government has faced growing international condemnation and pressure for its human rights violations in Tibet, but has denied any wrongdoing and claimed it has made new achievements in Tibet’s human rights cause.
It has faced growing international condemnation and pressure for its human rights abuses, as several countries boycotted last year’s Winter Olympics in Beijing, imposed sanctions and trade restrictions and supported UN human rights mechanisms to monitor and investigate the situation in China.
These are just some of the main human rights issues and trends in China over the past year.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS