While presidential and legislative election campaigns continue to heat up in Taiwan, Hong Kong on Dec. 10 held its first “patriots only” district council elections, which attracted a voter turnout of just 27.5 percent, the lowest since the territory was handed over to China in 1997. It was a massive plunge from the 2019 district elections amid democracy protests, when a record-high 71.23 percent of voters cast ballots, leading to a landslide victory for the democratic camp, which captured more than 85 percent of the seats.
After the 2019 election, Beijing imposed oppressive national security legislation on Hong Kong, while the Chinese National People’s Congress in 2021 revamped the territory’s electoral system, ensuring that only “patriots” could run for office. The number of directly elected district council seats was slashed from 462 to 88, with the other 382 controlled by the Hong Kong authorities and Chinese government loyalists. All candidates must be nominated by Hong Kong government committees, which have shut out all pro-democracy parties and advocates.
China also clamped down on dissent before the Dec. 10 election, while the Hong Kong government spent HK$1.15 billion (US$147.44 million) to promote election campaigns, including providing incentives for voters and asking all civil servants to participate.
However, the low turnout, compounded with a previous record-low turnout of 30.2 percent for the Seventh Legislative Council election in 2021, indicates that quite a few Hong Kongers decided not to bother because there were no real options on the ballots. The low turnout is obviously a “huge humiliation” to Hong Kong and Chinese authorities, as voters made a speechless protest over the China-controlled elections.
It also reflects Hong Kongers’ disillusionment with China’s “one country, two systems” fabrication, which pledged to allow free elections, but turned out to be a Hobson’s choice that contradicts universal democratic principles. “Hong Kongers ruling Hong Kong” has been replaced by “China-assigned patriots administering Hong Kong.”
The territory’s anti-democratic elections should be a warning for Taiwanese, especially as Beijing ramps up its efforts to manipulate Taiwan’s elections, aiming to help the pro-China camp acquire power and leadership, just like it did in Hong Kong.
One major component of China’s interference is deploying coercive military drills while depicting Taiwan’s elections as a choice between war and peace, hoping to scare Taiwanese into voting for pro-China candidates and parties, such as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party, both of which echo China’s language and call for closer cross-strait relations to ensure peace. Meanwhile, amid Chinese trade bans designed to suppress Taiwan’s economy, KMT presidential candidate New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) has proposed resuming the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement to deepen the nation’s reliance on the Chinese market, and vowed to open up for more Chinese to study and work in Taiwan. The proposals ignore the international trend of decoupling from China, which itself is undergoing economic hardships, and could sacrifice the welfare and rights of Taiwanese.
China has offered incentives to Taiwanese as part of its attempts to influence the elections, including underwriting trips for Taiwanese to visit China and providing benefits to encourage Taiwanese to relocate to Chinese coastal provinces. All of Beijing’s “united front” tactics are part of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) proposal of a new “one country, two systems” framework and deepening cross-strait integration for “peaceful unification,” which aims to eventually make Taiwan another Hong Kong.
Looking at Hong Kong’s anti-democratic election as a lesson, Taiwanese should seek to safeguard Taiwan’s precious democracy and self-determined sovereignty in next month’s polls.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
RSS