Split tickets not always best
In the legislative elections in 2020, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) number of regional legislative seats increased, but the DPP only won 33.9 percent of the total party votes for the legislators-at-large, which was similar to that of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) despite the KMT’s defeat in the regional legislative elections at that time.
The reason for this was that many voters who supported the pro-local regime voted for the DPP in the regional legislative elections, while casting their party votes to small parties with the same ideologies through split-ticket voting.
I cast my party votes for the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) in 2008 and 2012, the New Power Party (NPP) in 2016 and the Taiwan Statebuilding Party (TSP) in 2020. The TSU and TSP failed to cross the 5 percent threshold to have any legislator-at-large in 2008 and 2020 respectively.
For the upcoming legislative elections, former KMT presidential candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) is on top of the KMT’s nomination list for legislators-at-large, and he has been eyeing the legislative speaker’s seat. Some other nominees on the list include former Tainan City councilor Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介), who claims to embrace the Republic of China (ROC), but was once reluctant to wave an ROC flag at a 2019 campaign rally in Tainan, as well as the second-generation members of several questionable political families who try to portray a clean image. Plus, since the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) is likely to have more legislators-at-large this time, the TPP has been bragging about itself lately. Under such circumstances, I have decided to cast my party vote for the DPP, instead of voting for a split ticket.
For Taiwan’s legislature, there should be representative figures for the weak such as Jing Chuan Child Safety Foundation CEO Lin Yue-chin (林月琴), who is on top of the DPP’s nomination list, and political warriors such as assistant professor of civil engineering Wang Yi-chuan (王義川), who are able to refute Han, Hsieh and the TPP’s nominees for legislators-at-large like Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌). As long as the voters could focus their party votes on the DPP, even though Wang is in the 14th spot on the party’s nomination list and not within the first 12 nominees, also known as the “safe list,” he could still become a “safe” candidate.
Yi He-hsuan
Tainan
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS