Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) might be accused of twice breaking his promises and betraying the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), then launching a signature drive for himself to stand as a candidate in January’s presidential election, only to turn around and quit the race. It clearly shows that rich people are free to do as they like. If that is so, then Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is the perfect example of a political hack who changes his position as easily as turning the pages of a book.
Taiwanese independence supporters know that it was only with the help of the 2014 Sunflower movement opposed to a proposed cross-strait service trade agreement and thanks to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for not fielding its own candidate that Ko was elected as mayor of Taipei.
However, Ko says that he wants to restart the shelved agreement, and he reportedly even apologized to former KMT legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) for having supported the Sunflower movement.
Ko has always been in politics for his own interests, and he has made all kinds of groundless accusations against President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and the DPP administration.
On Nov. 15, Ko and the KMT signed six points of agreement on running a joint presidential ticket of Ko and the KMT’s nominee, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), but three days later Ko reneged on that consensus while making all kinds of excuses. Then, at the disastrous meeting between the KMT, the TPP and Gou on Thursday last week, Ko first agreed to Hou publicly reading aloud some text messages from his cellphone, but the next moment turned around and scolded Hou for doing so, saying that it was the sort of thing that celebrity pundits and mavericks would do.
Ko pulled Hou into a trap.
When Ko registered as a presidential candidate on Friday last week, wrecking any prospect for a joint ticket between the KMT and the TPP, and having just launched a verbal assault on the KMT, he said that he had tried very hard for the two parties to cooperate and that the two parties should not attack each other.
How can anyone be so brazen and shameless? Does the KMT now realize why the DPP has drawn a clear line between itself and Ko?
Having registered as a presidential candidate, Ko has heartily praised his running mate, TPP Legislator Cynthia Wu (吳欣盈), for being well accomplished in the arts.
However, in his autobiography The White Power (白色的力量), Ko wrote that “Taiwan’s top-notch talent go to medical school, and those who study the arts do not make the grade.” Compared with his praise for Wu, such self-aggrandizement and academic discrimination are a fine example of Ko’s nauseating hypocrisy.
How can Ko govern the country if nothing he says can be taken at face value? If the KMT and the DPP can agree on anything, it is that they should keep well clear of a political hack such as Ko.
Lai Yen-cheng is a graduate student at National Yangming Chiao Tung University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
RSS