Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) might be accused of twice breaking his promises and betraying the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), then launching a signature drive for himself to stand as a candidate in January’s presidential election, only to turn around and quit the race. It clearly shows that rich people are free to do as they like. If that is so, then Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is the perfect example of a political hack who changes his position as easily as turning the pages of a book.
Taiwanese independence supporters know that it was only with the help of the 2014 Sunflower movement opposed to a proposed cross-strait service trade agreement and thanks to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for not fielding its own candidate that Ko was elected as mayor of Taipei.
However, Ko says that he wants to restart the shelved agreement, and he reportedly even apologized to former KMT legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) for having supported the Sunflower movement.
Ko has always been in politics for his own interests, and he has made all kinds of groundless accusations against President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and the DPP administration.
On Nov. 15, Ko and the KMT signed six points of agreement on running a joint presidential ticket of Ko and the KMT’s nominee, New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), but three days later Ko reneged on that consensus while making all kinds of excuses. Then, at the disastrous meeting between the KMT, the TPP and Gou on Thursday last week, Ko first agreed to Hou publicly reading aloud some text messages from his cellphone, but the next moment turned around and scolded Hou for doing so, saying that it was the sort of thing that celebrity pundits and mavericks would do.
Ko pulled Hou into a trap.
When Ko registered as a presidential candidate on Friday last week, wrecking any prospect for a joint ticket between the KMT and the TPP, and having just launched a verbal assault on the KMT, he said that he had tried very hard for the two parties to cooperate and that the two parties should not attack each other.
How can anyone be so brazen and shameless? Does the KMT now realize why the DPP has drawn a clear line between itself and Ko?
Having registered as a presidential candidate, Ko has heartily praised his running mate, TPP Legislator Cynthia Wu (吳欣盈), for being well accomplished in the arts.
However, in his autobiography The White Power (白色的力量), Ko wrote that “Taiwan’s top-notch talent go to medical school, and those who study the arts do not make the grade.” Compared with his praise for Wu, such self-aggrandizement and academic discrimination are a fine example of Ko’s nauseating hypocrisy.
How can Ko govern the country if nothing he says can be taken at face value? If the KMT and the DPP can agree on anything, it is that they should keep well clear of a political hack such as Ko.
Lai Yen-cheng is a graduate student at National Yangming Chiao Tung University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS