The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) last week unveiled its legislator-at-large nominees for the Jan. 13 elections, with Kuma Academy cofounder Puma Shen (沈伯洋) at the top of the list. Coincidentally, in a recent talk show, China Television Co (CTV) compared the Kuma Academy to the Islamist militant movement Hamas.
The major role of the Kuma Academy is not to launch a war or invade other countries, but to safeguard Taiwan and prepare its people for battle. To compare it to Hamas, a terrorist organization that has launched merciless attacks on Israelis, is not only unfair, but a serious abuse of freedom of speech. The show only served as China’s mouthpiece in spreading its propaganda.
Perhaps this kind of conflict arises out Taiwan’s lack of a national security strategy, one which would clearly outline the state’s allies, enemies and values. With such a document, the military would know what they are fighting for.
In the US, every new administration publishes its own National Security Strategy report, such as former US president Barack Obama’s “pivot to East Asia,” and US President Joe Biden’s statement of China remaining the largest threat to global order. With a document setting the tone, both government and opposition unite and rally behind the consensus.
If Taiwan were to put its national security strategy to paper, what would it say? If the document were to list China as the largest threat to Taiwan, it could spark a backlash, with critics condemning it for opting for division and enmity over dialogue and friendship.
The Chinese threat remains the elephant in the room, mutually felt yet shielded from open discussion. Despite the two sides of the Taiwan Strait having had their own governments for more than 70 years, there is still a percentage of people, especially those who retreated to Taiwan from China with the KMT and their offspring, that are still shackled to ideas of “unification” and “returning to the motherland.” With such mixed identities and complications, made worse by polarization, it is no wonder that Taiwan cannot come up with its own national security strategy.
Not wanting to face the inconvenient truth of China being the biggest enemy, this mentality has given pro-China politicians much to work on, such as advocating the idea that arming oneself to the teeth is a “provocation.”
There are periodic cases of retired generals receiving bribes to surrender to China and overthrow the DPP government, or officials being invited to attend lavish parties to help promote “peaceful unification” and “one China, two systems.” People might be surprised why such personnel, who should be the most patriotic, are the most susceptible to treason and bribery.
This issue could be traced back to the time of former president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) rule, which promoted the five basic values: national ideology, national leader, country, duty and honor. As a party-controlled state, and the party leader as the head of state, military personnel were taught to worship and place their loyalties to the leader, not the nation. Taiwan has since become a democratic society, but some military personnel have yet to excise these demons from their mentality.
Without defining the enemy or having a clear idea of what they are defending, military personnel are easily led astray with bribes or other seductions.
In view of next year’s presidential election, it is high time that different parties come to a consensus on China and turn it into Taiwan’s version of a national security strategy. The Russian invasion triggered Ukrainians into uniting behind the same cause. Taiwan should not leave that question to a time when war breaks out, only to belatedly realize the invaluable importance of freedom and democracy.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS