Taiwan and Japan are closely connected with one another in terms of their history, geography and people. The connection is much more intimate than that between any other two countries. Throughout the course of human history, no two neighboring countries have ever shared such warm feelings toward each other.
Due to their geographical proximity, Taiwan and Japan confront almost the same natural disasters. When a disaster occurs, the two countries always assist one another.
Today, Taiwan and Japan have to deal with more than a natural disaster, they have to contend with the threat posed by China. Beijing has already demonstrated its expansionist ambitions. This is a significant issue that Taiwan and Japan have to face together.
Taiwanese believe that Japan is a right-minded nation. Japan’s distinctive bushido spirit still exists in various forms, and it is in the heart of every Japanese despite each person’s different social status. This is something that Taiwanese admire the most.
It is therefore regrettable that Tokyo has yet to recognize Taiwan as a country. Even though Taiwan and Japan help each other when a natural disaster occurs, the two countries cannot deepen their collaboration in terms of security and defense.
Taiwan and Japan would have to confront any serious crisis caused by China without a properly established collaborative relationship. This is a question of life or death.
The Formosa Republican Association is the largest conservative civil society organization in Taiwan. We have communicated with Japanese experts and exchanged ideas on regional security and defense.
However, as a civil society organization, the association cannot deal with security and defense issues by itself.
On Nov. 8, international political scientists, including top Japanese academic Genki Fujii, organized a symposium to demonstrate support for Taiwan, titled “One Taiwan 2023.” During the meeting, participants called on the Japanese government to create its own “Taiwan Relations Act.”
I sincerely hope that the honorable people of Japan can make the most of this opportunity and push the Japanese National Diet to create its own Taiwan Relations Act.
Taiwan’s legal status could be lucidly defined in the act, and it would be able to collaborate with Japan on security and defense. That way, Asia’s freedom, democracy and security could be safeguarded by Taiwan and Japan.
Tommy Lin is the chairman of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Emma Liu
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing