Former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) topped the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) list of legislator-at-large nominations for the Jan. 13 elections, while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) listed Jing Chuan Child Safety Foundation CEO Lin Yue-chin (林月琴) in its first spot.
The legislator-at-large nominations showed that the focus of the KMT and DPP were different, and it is obvious which is better.
Despite having millions of “Han fans,” Han’s political career has revealed his desire for power, highlighted in his shenanigans to polarize and divide the electorate. In his astronomical rise in 2018, he rode a wave of impractical expectations and the delusions that certain extremely enthusiastic Taiwanese have of politicians.
The KMT listed Han atop its legislator-at-large list to appeal to the former Kaohsiung mayor’s support base, hoping they would bring some of their infectious enthusiasm to the party. In other words, the KMT cares more about divisiveness and polarization than it values contributions to society or image, showing how the KMT places cronyism over talent.
By contrast, although Lin has no political experience or throngs of fawning fans, she has spent her time working on child and youth protection and social welfare, caring for the most vulnerable groups.
Putting her in the top spot of its legislator-at-large list means that the DPP appreciates her hard work and hopes she could keep working on the issues in the Legislative Yuan.
The top candidates from the two parties possess different qualities, indicating different political values and prospects for Taiwan. Political parties should not keep talking about the people and the nation without doing anything. Instead, they should consider public welfare a priority and change radical advocates’ thinking, to promote social harmony and cooperation.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s