Former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) topped the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) list of legislator-at-large nominations for the Jan. 13 elections, while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) listed Jing Chuan Child Safety Foundation CEO Lin Yue-chin (林月琴) in its first spot.
The legislator-at-large nominations showed that the focus of the KMT and DPP were different, and it is obvious which is better.
Despite having millions of “Han fans,” Han’s political career has revealed his desire for power, highlighted in his shenanigans to polarize and divide the electorate. In his astronomical rise in 2018, he rode a wave of impractical expectations and the delusions that certain extremely enthusiastic Taiwanese have of politicians.
The KMT listed Han atop its legislator-at-large list to appeal to the former Kaohsiung mayor’s support base, hoping they would bring some of their infectious enthusiasm to the party. In other words, the KMT cares more about divisiveness and polarization than it values contributions to society or image, showing how the KMT places cronyism over talent.
By contrast, although Lin has no political experience or throngs of fawning fans, she has spent her time working on child and youth protection and social welfare, caring for the most vulnerable groups.
Putting her in the top spot of its legislator-at-large list means that the DPP appreciates her hard work and hopes she could keep working on the issues in the Legislative Yuan.
The top candidates from the two parties possess different qualities, indicating different political values and prospects for Taiwan. Political parties should not keep talking about the people and the nation without doing anything. Instead, they should consider public welfare a priority and change radical advocates’ thinking, to promote social harmony and cooperation.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has a good reason to avoid a split vote against the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in next month’s presidential election. It has been here before and last time things did not go well. Taiwan had its second direct presidential election in 2000 and the nation’s first ever transition of political power, with the KMT in opposition for the first time. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was ushered in with less than 40 percent of the vote, only marginally ahead of James Soong (宋楚瑜), the candidate of the then-newly formed People First Party (PFP), who got almost 37
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) has called on his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) counterpart, William Lai (賴清德), to abandon his party’s Taiwanese independence platform. Hou’s remarks follow an article published in the Nov. 30 issue of Foreign Affairs by three US-China relations academics: Bonnie Glaser, Jessica Chen Weiss and Thomas Christensen. They suggested that the US emphasize opposition to any unilateral changes in the “status quo” across the Taiwan Strait, and that if Lai wins the election, he should consider freezing the Taiwanese independence clause. The concept of de jure independence was first
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday reiterated that he is “deep-green at heart” and that he would mostly continue President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) national defense and foreign policies if elected. However, he was still seriously considering forming a “blue-white” electoral alliance with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) less than a month ago, telling students he “hates the KMT, but loathes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) even more,” while constantly criticizing Tsai’s foreign policy these past few years. Many critics have said that Ko’s latest remarks were aimed at attracting green-leaning swing voters, as recent polls
Taiwan’s Ministry of Labor and India’s Ministry of External Affairs have confirmed that the two countries plan to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) this month on recruiting Indians to work in Taiwan. While this marks another step in deepening ties between the two nations, it has also stirred debate, as misunderstandings and disinformation about the plan abound. Taiwan is grappling with a shortage of workers due to a low birthrate and a society that is projected to turn super-aged by 2025. Official statistics show that Taiwan has a labor shortfall of at least 60,000 to 80,000, which is expected
RSS