A funding squeeze and uncertain growth prospects are making Singapore start-ups less than gung-ho about adding to the city-state’s 18,000-strong fintech workforce. However, it might not be a bad time to look for jobs in the Asian financial center. Rivals like Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi are hungry for qualified professionals and that is making Singapore’s immigration hurdles less onerous than before.
In a 2021 Accenture survey, nearly two out of three firms blamed their talent gap on not being able to get work permits for foreigners. Nowadays, only 37 percent cite difficulty in securing employment passes as a hiring challenge. For this dramatic change, the employers and employees should thank Hong Kong.
The Chinese special administrative region is intent on reversing its brain drain, initially caused by a crackdown against political dissent, and then, by its isolationist COVID-19 policies. This year, however, Hong Kong is back in the game. A Top Talent Pass program, introduced late last year, is luring graduates of prestigious universities globally by offering a 24-month visa even if they do not have job offers in hand. In the first nine months of the year the Chinese territory gave out 100,000 work permits, nearly two-and-a-half times as many as it did last year.
Singapore cannot afford to slim down when Hong Kong is bulking up. The city-state’s annual fintech festival took place last week amid a drought in growth capital. Through the first three quarters, the sector witnessed only US$1 billion in deal volumes. This is a second year of decline — from US$5.5 billion in 2021 and US$2.6 billion last year. The crypto meltdown last year has killed the buzz around decentralized finance. At the same time, Hong Kong appears to have Beijing’s tacit approval to position itself as a retail hub for trading virtual assets.
Then there is the immigration question. Starting with the 2011 general elections, Singaporean voters have sent a consistently strong message that they would like fewer foreigners in their midst. Strict controls on overseas-worker visas since then have affected all industries, including banking and fintech. While the local talent pool is limited in breadth and depth, hiring overseas remains a hot-button political issue.
With non-citizens accounting for almost 40 percent of the city-state’s 5.9 million population, an abrupt reversal in policy is not in the cards — especially when Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) has dropped hints that polls, due by November 2025, might be held as early as next year.
Instead, Singapore is filling the void left by the desertion of overseas workers during the pandemic. From July 2019 to June 2021, foreign employment excluding domestic workers shrank by 194,000. In the 24 months through June this year, it grew by 260,000. That works out to an average annual increase of less than 17,000 over four years, a cautious pace of expansion.
It is important to take in enough fresh blood to keep the aging society at the forefront of innovation, especially when it comes to the Singapore’s core competence in trade and finance. That means more software developers, sales and compliance specialists, artificial intelligence (AI) engineers and product managers. Cryptocurrency ventures might no longer be as exciting as they were two years ago, but the city-state’s central bank remains very interested in tokenizing financial assets by partnering with the likes of JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup Inc and T Rowe Price Group Inc. Meanwhile, interest in artificial intelligence — the central theme for this year’s fintech festival — is boiling over.
And here, competition is not limited to Hong Kong, the traditional rival. Armed with its own open-access large language model, Abu Dhabi is making a serious pitch to woo AI talent. That is why under a new points-based system for employment passes that came into effect from Sept. 1, applicants who possess skills in short supply, and firms that contribute to Singapore’s strategic economic priorities, will earn bonus points toward their total scores.
However, this might not be enough. It is not just other cities doing more to lure talent. Large technology companies and financial institutions might also be crowding out smaller ventures. Gartner Inc’s June forecast is for an 8 percent increase in worldwide banking and investment services information technology spending this year.
“Candidates prefer to work for incumbents” was cited as a hiring challenge by 64 percent of the firms in the Accenture survey. Large multinationals “may offer better job stability, career progression opportunities, monetary and non-monetary rewards and market-aligned benefits,” the Singapore FinTech Association and Accenture said in their joint report.
Despite their funding constraints, Singapore’s fintech start-ups still want to hire, though not as strongly as last year’s 40 percent jump in headcount. While securing work permits would not be a cakewalk, it would not be the showstopper it was two years ago. The red carpet for talent put out by rival employment centers and large firms is making sure of that.
Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services in Asia. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has a good reason to avoid a split vote against the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in next month’s presidential election. It has been here before and last time things did not go well. Taiwan had its second direct presidential election in 2000 and the nation’s first ever transition of political power, with the KMT in opposition for the first time. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was ushered in with less than 40 percent of the vote, only marginally ahead of James Soong (宋楚瑜), the candidate of the then-newly formed People First Party (PFP), who got almost 37
At their recent summit in San Francisco, US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) made progress in a few key areas. Notably, they agreed to resume direct military-to-military communications — which China had suspended last year, following a visit by then-speaker of the US House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan — to reduce the chances of accidental conflict. However, neither leader was negotiating from a particularly strong position: As Biden struggles with low approval ratings, Xi is overseeing a rapidly weakening economy. The economic news out of China has been poor for some time. Growth is slowing;
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) has called on his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) counterpart, William Lai (賴清德), to abandon his party’s Taiwanese independence platform. Hou’s remarks follow an article published in the Nov. 30 issue of Foreign Affairs by three US-China relations academics: Bonnie Glaser, Jessica Chen Weiss and Thomas Christensen. They suggested that the US emphasize opposition to any unilateral changes in the “status quo” across the Taiwan Strait, and that if Lai wins the election, he should consider freezing the Taiwanese independence clause. The concept of de jure independence was first
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday reiterated that he is “deep-green at heart” and that he would mostly continue President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) national defense and foreign policies if elected. However, he was still seriously considering forming a “blue-white” electoral alliance with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) less than a month ago, telling students he “hates the KMT, but loathes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) even more,” while constantly criticizing Tsai’s foreign policy these past few years. Many critics have said that Ko’s latest remarks were aimed at attracting green-leaning swing voters, as recent polls