A funding squeeze and uncertain growth prospects are making Singapore start-ups less than gung-ho about adding to the city-state’s 18,000-strong fintech workforce. However, it might not be a bad time to look for jobs in the Asian financial center. Rivals like Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi are hungry for qualified professionals and that is making Singapore’s immigration hurdles less onerous than before.
In a 2021 Accenture survey, nearly two out of three firms blamed their talent gap on not being able to get work permits for foreigners. Nowadays, only 37 percent cite difficulty in securing employment passes as a hiring challenge. For this dramatic change, the employers and employees should thank Hong Kong.
The Chinese special administrative region is intent on reversing its brain drain, initially caused by a crackdown against political dissent, and then, by its isolationist COVID-19 policies. This year, however, Hong Kong is back in the game. A Top Talent Pass program, introduced late last year, is luring graduates of prestigious universities globally by offering a 24-month visa even if they do not have job offers in hand. In the first nine months of the year the Chinese territory gave out 100,000 work permits, nearly two-and-a-half times as many as it did last year.
Singapore cannot afford to slim down when Hong Kong is bulking up. The city-state’s annual fintech festival took place last week amid a drought in growth capital. Through the first three quarters, the sector witnessed only US$1 billion in deal volumes. This is a second year of decline — from US$5.5 billion in 2021 and US$2.6 billion last year. The crypto meltdown last year has killed the buzz around decentralized finance. At the same time, Hong Kong appears to have Beijing’s tacit approval to position itself as a retail hub for trading virtual assets.
Then there is the immigration question. Starting with the 2011 general elections, Singaporean voters have sent a consistently strong message that they would like fewer foreigners in their midst. Strict controls on overseas-worker visas since then have affected all industries, including banking and fintech. While the local talent pool is limited in breadth and depth, hiring overseas remains a hot-button political issue.
With non-citizens accounting for almost 40 percent of the city-state’s 5.9 million population, an abrupt reversal in policy is not in the cards — especially when Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍) has dropped hints that polls, due by November 2025, might be held as early as next year.
Instead, Singapore is filling the void left by the desertion of overseas workers during the pandemic. From July 2019 to June 2021, foreign employment excluding domestic workers shrank by 194,000. In the 24 months through June this year, it grew by 260,000. That works out to an average annual increase of less than 17,000 over four years, a cautious pace of expansion.
It is important to take in enough fresh blood to keep the aging society at the forefront of innovation, especially when it comes to the Singapore’s core competence in trade and finance. That means more software developers, sales and compliance specialists, artificial intelligence (AI) engineers and product managers. Cryptocurrency ventures might no longer be as exciting as they were two years ago, but the city-state’s central bank remains very interested in tokenizing financial assets by partnering with the likes of JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup Inc and T Rowe Price Group Inc. Meanwhile, interest in artificial intelligence — the central theme for this year’s fintech festival — is boiling over.
And here, competition is not limited to Hong Kong, the traditional rival. Armed with its own open-access large language model, Abu Dhabi is making a serious pitch to woo AI talent. That is why under a new points-based system for employment passes that came into effect from Sept. 1, applicants who possess skills in short supply, and firms that contribute to Singapore’s strategic economic priorities, will earn bonus points toward their total scores.
However, this might not be enough. It is not just other cities doing more to lure talent. Large technology companies and financial institutions might also be crowding out smaller ventures. Gartner Inc’s June forecast is for an 8 percent increase in worldwide banking and investment services information technology spending this year.
“Candidates prefer to work for incumbents” was cited as a hiring challenge by 64 percent of the firms in the Accenture survey. Large multinationals “may offer better job stability, career progression opportunities, monetary and non-monetary rewards and market-aligned benefits,” the Singapore FinTech Association and Accenture said in their joint report.
Despite their funding constraints, Singapore’s fintech start-ups still want to hire, though not as strongly as last year’s 40 percent jump in headcount. While securing work permits would not be a cakewalk, it would not be the showstopper it was two years ago. The red carpet for talent put out by rival employment centers and large firms is making sure of that.
Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services in Asia. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS