With election campaigns under way, presidential candidates of the opposition parties have turned to support the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮). New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, once called the question of reactivating the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant rhetorical, saying that “no solution for nuclear waste means no nuclear power.” Now he says that he would not phase out nuclear power.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) used to find fault with the the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant policy. Now he says that nuclear power should be considered necessary.
In 1980, the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project was launched in Yenliao (鹽寮) in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮). Construction proceeded intermittingly, but in 2014, it came to a halt. The Control Yuan investigated and censured the project several times. The Atomic Energy Council also handed fines to those involved in the construction. Today, the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project is unfinished, with numerous safety issues still plaguing the site.
On Dec. 31, 2020, the construction permit for the plant expired. As specified by Article 5 and Article 30 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法), construction cannot resume without a permit. Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) thus filed an application, which was approved by the Nuclear Safety Commission, the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the New Taipei City Government and Gongliao District Office. It was decided that the construction would be halted, and the surrounding area would no longer be restricted as a low-density residential zone.
Yet the area has had its designation changed as a nuclear power facility. This is not in line with Article 26 in the Urban Planning Act (都市計畫法), which specifies that modification is needed once the land development is changed. Additionally, Article 49 of the Land Expropriation Act (土地徵收條例) requires that the expropriation of land be revoked once it is no longer reserved for public facilities.
When construction on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant was halted in 2014, the total installed power capacity in Taiwan was 48,819MW. This September, the capacity reached 63,483MW — an increase of 14,664MW — much more than the capacity that would have been generated by the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant (270MW). Today, Taiwan’s renewable energy installations have a 16,966MW capacity, a huge increase compared with before (3,836MW).
In 2014, the annual electricity production was 2,599GWh (gigawatt-hours). Last year, the number increased to 2,881GWh. Clearly, it is unnecessary to be fixated on the controversial Fourth Nuclear Power Plant.
The construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant has already been blocked through referendums five times. Nevertheless, with or without the Referendum Act (公民投票法), politicians are still obsessed with this unsafe nuclear power plant.
Referendum Act Article 30 and Article 32 say that the result of a referendum is legally binding for two years. If the ruling party is determined to abolish the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project, it must modify the land usage as soon as possible and revoke the expropriation of the land. The ruling party should also plan the transition of the land to rid the public of the four-decade-long Fourth Nuclear Power Plant dispute. That way, Taiwan could achieve a transition to sustainable energy much faster.
Tsai Ya-ying is an attorney for the Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association.
Translated by Emma Liu
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS