According to the Ministry of Labor, Taipei and New Delhi are to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) before the end of this year, allowing for Indian migrant workers to come to Taiwan. This is beneficial to both sides.
Today, most migrant workers in Taiwan are from Southeast Asia. Cultural differences between Taiwan and India are more obvious than those between Taiwan and Southeast Asian countries, and the government should come up with ways to deal with Taiwan’s lack of understanding so that the plan could be carried out smoothly.
The first issue is language. Most people think that all Indians are fluent in English, which is not true. On the contrary, only 10 percent of the Indian population use English as their primary language. The percentage of Indian workers capable of speaking English is even lower. The Indian constitution recognizes 22 official languages and the primary language in use varies from region to region. The government’s foremost task is to take care of language and translation issues for Indian migrant workers. Without appropriate interpreters, it would be difficult for Taiwanese supervisors to communicate with Indian overseers who manage other workers. Therefore, more resources should be invested in training intermediate supervisors in managing Indian workers.
Religion is another issue. Around 80 percent of the Indian population practice Hinduism, whereas in Taiwan, only one Hindu temple has been officially recognized. In the past, there were some Indians who had turned their houses into Hindu temples, causing serious community disputes; a lawsuit was even filed. If more than 10,000 Indian migrant workers are to come to Taiwan, the religious needs and potential problems would increase.
Additionally, Indians have their own dietary needs due to religious reasons. There was an incident in which Indian students cooked curry in their dormitory and Taiwanese students protested. For followers of Hinduism, eating beef is a sin. For the second-largest religious community in India, Muslims, eating pork or derivative products is forbidden. Many Indians are vegetarians. If these dietary needs cannot be met, managing Indian workers would be a difficult task.
The government also needs to consider which sectors Indian migrant workers would participate in. Taiwan’s labor-intensive industries are confronting serious labor shortages. For this reason, the government might want to increase its admission quota for Indian students enrolling in technical courses or collaborative industry-academia programs at the university level. This has become a sensitive issue for the official agencies, given that in recent years, some illegal agencies and private universities have exploited foreign students in the name of educational exchange.
Even so, if the government would allow Indians to come to Taiwan as students and workers at once, studying toward further degrees while working part-time, Indians would be able to pay their tuition while learning technical skills. This would be a “triple-win” situation for universities currently dealing with a lack of students due to the country’s low fertility rates, for industries facing labor shortages and for Indians seeking opportunities abroad. This triple-win situation could be achieved by regulating wicked brokers and illicit agencies. The government should not throw the baby out with the bathwater.
The migrant workers quota must be discussed. India has become the most populous country, and Indian workers are certain to become a labor force in other places such as the Middle East. It has been reported that the government might bring in 100,000 Indian migrant workers. However, before more comprehensive measures are put in place, the government should start with a trial period with a smaller group of Indian migrant workers to see if everything goes as planned. Today, communication between Taiwanese and Indian societies is still quite limited. A large group of Indians who suddenly appear in Taiwan might cause an impact. If Taiwanese are not ready for this, cultural differences might lead to misunderstanding or even discrimination, and that would be extremely disadvantageous to deepening and developing Taiwan-Indian relations in the long run.
Lastly, to facilitate this plan, the government should enhance the personnel at the embassy and official agencies so that the review process could be implemented smoothly. Before the plan is carried out, governmental officials should also consult with professional institutions and experts in India on migrant worker issues.
A well-intentioned plan should not be rushed into right before an election just for the sake of winning more votes.
Fang Tien-sze is a visiting professor at National Chengchi University’s Department of Diplomacy and deputy director at National Tsing Hua University’s Center for India Studies.
Translated by Emma Liu
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS