Middle-class people do not want Taiwan to remain stuck in a conflict between the “blue” and “green” political camps, or for every election to become a battle of ideologies. They want Taiwan to become a normal democratic country where, no matter which party is in power, there will always be a loyal opposition to strictly supervise the governing party, and where alternation of ruling parties is the norm.
However, just as the idea of a “blue-white” electoral alliance between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) seemed to be on the verge of collapse, on Friday last week former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the KMT suddenly announced via one of his advisers that he supported the suggestion made by TPP Chairman and presidential nominee Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) that a “national opinion poll” should be the basis for deciding which party’s nominee in a possible “blue-white” joint ticket should be the presidential candidate and which should stand for vice president.
Former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) immediately expressed his support for Ma’s statement, which was then eagerly taken up by the news media. This unexpected turn of events looked like a stab in the back for KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the party’s presidential candidate.
Ma and Ko have not had much to do with one another, and although Han has had friendly relations with Ko, he has recently been giving considerable support to Hou’s election bid. Why, then, have Ma and Han joined forces overnight?
Furthermore, former KMT legislators Alex Tsai (蔡正元) and Chiu Yi (邱毅) expressed their support for Ko early on, while Ko wants the controversial Xu Chunying (徐春鶯), who was born in China, to be on the TPP’s list of legislator-at-large nominees.
These signs make one suspect that forces associated with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) are interfering behind the scenes. I do not want to engage in suspicion and speculation or to paint anyone “red,” but the changing situation is quite disconcerting.
In 2014, I, like many of my friends, supported the then-independent Ko in the Taipei mayoral election in opposition to the KMT candidate Sean Lien (連勝文), with the aim of creating a new political climate in Taiwan and in the hope that some new changes and opportunities would emerge by breaking free of the longstanding confrontation between the “blue” KMT and the “green” Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Who would have expected that nine years later Taiwan would be facing not only the same old “blue-green” confrontation, but also the ubiquitous infiltration of pro-Chinese forces.
China’s influence is no longer just a matter of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) shouting about “one country, two systems,” but also a matter of the CCP using all available ways to gather together parties and individuals who are opposed to Taiwan’s independence and force them into an unholy alliance with the aim of using elections to eliminate Taiwanese independence and hasten cross-strait unification.
Surely the majority of people in Taiwan, no matter which party they prefer, are determined not to be unified with China. Surely they do not want to go on suffering from China’s military threats.
We all want Taiwan to remain peaceful, democratic and prosperous. In the forthcoming presidential and legislative elections, regardless of whether the KMT and TPP manage to form a “blue-white alliance,” or how much China interferes, we should all join forces to make sure that the DPP’s presidential candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德), is elected with more than half of the votes.
Lin Jin-jia is a psychiatrist.
Translated by Julian Clegg
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
RSS