A photograph taken yesterday shows former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) and Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) clasping hands outside the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation in Taipei. The picture was meant to be a show of unity.
The men had just emerged from a closed-door meeting to iron out the mechanism by which a joint ticket between Hou, the KMT’s presidential candidate, and Ko, the TPP’s candidate, in a “blue-white alliance” is to be decided. Ma was at the meeting as a witness.
Too much can be read into an image, but the optics do tell a tale.
Chu and Hou, to Ma’s right, are beaming. Their hands are upon each others, and then on Ma’s.
Ko is separated from them, to Ma’s left. His hand is not touching Chu’s or Hou’s, and it appears as if Ma is cajoling Ko to join the handshake.
Ko’s other hand is in a fist. He is barely smiling. If anything, he appears to have an expression of smug recognition that he got what he wanted.
After weeks of stalled talks and a string of stalemates, the two parties agreed on a public poll, with the results to be announced on Saturday.
Although the details are hazy, it seems that a Hou-led ticket is more likely — if the poll results are within the margin of error of other polling — but Ko won the argument on the survey’s format.
On the surface, Ko came out on top because he had little to lose. Hou and Chu might be satisfied when the result is announced, but the KMT’s image and status as the main opposition party, having once been the most powerful party in Taiwan, has been bruised further by this protracted process. It has highlighted intraparty tension and further jeopardized its unity.
The biggest winners were Ma and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as the agreement has boosted the chances that the Democratic Progressive Party’s candidate, Vice President William Lai (賴清德) — who the CCP calls a “Taiwan independence secessionist” — would be defeated.
Hou’s compromise on a poll to decide the ticket, which he and Chu had vehemently held out against, has Ma’s hand all over it. It was Ko who wanted him to attend after successive rounds of talks had come to nothing.
In pushing KMT-TPP unity, Ma has taken Ko’s side over Hou’s, and by so doing — whether intentionally or not — has created new cracks in the KMT.
It might have been better for the KMT’s integrity and future had it settled for losing the presidency, but improving its power in the legislature — which would have allowed it to maintain its autonomy and dignity.
The emphasis on the alliance and political power for its own sake, without focusing on its principles and policies, has caused tensions within the pan-blue camp, with People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) critical of the alliance for aligning with the TPP instead of approaching his own party.
Soong directed most of his ire at Ma.
While the People First Party might be a spent force, the same might apply to the KMT if the election in January goes poorly for it.
The CCP would not care much either way about the KMT’s fate, as its primary concern is keeping Lai out of the Presidential Office.
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS