Masahiro Hara, the Denso Wave Inc engineer who invented the two-dimensional barcode known as quick response, or QR, had never imagined that his system of labeling automotive parts would one day become a crucial pillar of monetary exchange.
That innovation has emerged as a preferred form of contactless transfer of value across Asia and Latin America, starting with China’s Alipay and WeChat 12 years ago. Small retailers who could not afford costly credit card terminals and high fees have been the biggest beneficiaries, as have consumers who have traditionally lacked access to bank accounts — Southeast Asia alone has 80 e-wallets used by more than 200 million people.
Now comes the next big thing: A move toward integrating disparate apps so that one day a single QR would work anywhere in the world.
Brazil’s Pix QR, India’s UPI QR, Indonesia’s QRIS, the Philippines’ QR Ph and Singapore’s SGQR are all successful examples of the basic idea that a merchant should not have to display scores of barcodes to accept funds from different sources. A single image ought to be compatible with every consumer app and wallet.
Add a second objective to that. Foreign tourists must be able to whip out their smartphones and settle bills just like locals. National payment systems such as India’s are aggressively entering into agreements that would allow other countries to use them. The major economies of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) — Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam and the Philippines — are linking their QRs for the 18 million tourists who spend about US$19 billion annually. Assuming that it is able to capture 15 percent to 20 percent of transactions, ASEAN QR would facilitate US$4 billion in consumer expenditure, the Boston Consulting Group said.
There is a lot of work to be done. Consolidating the labels in a single repository does not always solve the problem of multiple contractual relationships, each of which comes with its own accounting. For instance, Singapore shops that display the common QR need to individually sign up with a host of payment methods. Only then can they accept Alipay, GrabPay, ShopeePay and others.
This month, the city-state is piloting a new strategy. An improved version of its common QR — SGQR+ — will ask retailers to enter into only one relationship to accept payments from any of the 23 participating wallets and apps. Consequently, a mom-and-pop operation will have to deal with a single set of accounts that could consolidate transfers coming in via popular local platforms as well as China’s Alipay, WeChat and UnionPay, Thailand’s PromptPay, and Malaysia’s DuitNow.
Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc, which have also been offering their own QR-code options for the past six to seven years, will be joining in via XNAP, a cross-border network. Google Pay is planning to do the same. In one of the pilot’s two tracks, merchants are being promised next-day settlement.
Policymakers in Europe and North America need to watch this experiment closely. So far, they have not paid enough attention to QR because their consumers’ demand for contactless payments is currently well served by near-field communication (NFC), a technology for wireless data — and money — transfer between devices that are in close proximity.
However, Singapore, too, is a mature payments market with wide NFC usage. According to an EY-Parthenon analysis, 57 percent of retail transactions in the financial center last year were settled with credit and debit cards. In the 18 percent of instances where a digital wallet was used, consumers chose to pay 97 percent of the time without scanning QR codes. They used faster methods, such as NFC-enabled cards stored in Apple Pay.
The reason why Singapore is still determined to fine-tune QR code-based payment is not its meager 3 percent share in digital-wallet transactions, but its 72 percent compounded annual growth over the past five years. This rapid expansion is being driven by tiny enterprises that began to go digital during the pandemic. Considering that 19 percent of the city’s of point-of-sale transactions last year were in cash, the government’s Hawkers Go Digital program still has a long way to go. Enabling food carts and street vendors to get the maximum possible share of tourist dollars (or yen, or yuan, or rupees) ought to be a worthy goal for greater financial inclusion in any economy, developed or developing.
A successful SGQR+ could emerge as the blueprint of a global initiative. The ultimate aim should be a vast open loop in which even the smallest of businesses can go cashless and accept funds from any customer, local or foreign. Efficient as they are in packing a lot of data in tiny black-and-white squares, Denso Wave’s barcodes are unlikely to be the last word in exchange of monetary value. But their full potential could only be realized when a single QR suffices for all of the world’s payments.
Andy Mukherjee is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies and financial services in Asia. Previously, he worked for Reuters, the Straits Times and Bloomberg News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS