When presenting his energy platform on Wednesday last week, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) mentioned that during his time as Taipei mayor, he rejected a NT$1 billion food (US$31 million) waste treatment plant project, saying that he never had food waste when eating, and he wanted to train Taipei residents to not leave food waste.
This matter provides three insights into Ko.
First, he was meant to propose an energy policy, but did not do his homework on biomass energy and complacently exposed his ignorance on the issue. Taichung Waipu Green Energy Ecological Park — the first biomass power plant in Taiwan that has been operating since July 2019 — can process more than 50,000 tonnes of food waste each year and generate approximately 6 million to 8.8 million kilowatt hours of electricity.
Second, based on his own limited knowledge (he could not tell the difference between leftovers and kitchen waste), he vetoed a decision making process that should have been approached from a professional perspective (such as investment benefit analysis, alternatives, etc.). This also reflects Ko’s tendency to simplify complex things.
Third, it reveals Ko’s patronizing mindset of “I know better than others.” Ko’s narcissistic character is reminiscent of another political figure, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). After Taiwan’s presidential election in January 2016, China’s China Review News Agency commented that Ma was “narcissistic, selfish, suspicious and unkind. Ma should bear the most responsibility for losing the election.”
A poll conducted by a pro-blue TV station on May 13, 2016, just before Ma stepped down, showed that the approval rate of Ma’s eight-year administration was only 23 percent, which was actually the highest during Ma’s second term. At its lowest, his approval rating dropped to as low as 11 percent. Another TV station’s poll had it as low as 9.2 percent, which led to the ridiculing of Ma as “Mr Nine Percent.”
This narcissistic defeated general still feels good about himself today and frequently tries to “instruct” the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and even the people in Taiwan.
Ko is no better than Ma. As early as the first anniversary of his inauguration as Taipei mayor, Ko’s KMT rival, Sean Lien (連勝文), a KMT vice chairman, said that Ko was “extraordinarily narcissistic.” Ko responded at the time that “narcissism is not easy to change, but it is not very serious,” followed by, in trademark Ko style: “This is not narcissism, it is self-confidence. It is true that Ko can be overconfident sometimes.”
Many of Ko’s supporters “expect a rule-breaker,” and Ko is that person. Indeed, Ko will bring about change, but what is more important is what it will be changed into. The change (breaking the rules) might not necessarily be an improvement — it might also be a change for the worse. The narcissistic Ko has given the answer after eight years as Taipei mayor. Do we really need to bet our future on the narcissistic Ko again — this time, the future of the entire country?
Wu Hai-ruei is a manager of a listed company.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Taiwan Retrocession Day is observed on Oct. 25 every year. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government removed it from the list of annual holidays immediately following the first successful transition of power in 2000, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led opposition reinstated it this year. For ideological reasons, it has been something of a political football in the democratic era. This year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designated yesterday as “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” turning the event into a conceptual staging post for its “restoration” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Mainland Affairs Council on Friday criticized
A Reuters report published this week highlighted the struggles of migrant mothers in Taiwan through the story of Marian Duhapa, a Filipina forced to leave her infant behind to work in Taiwan and support her family. After becoming pregnant in Taiwan last year, Duhapa lost her job and lived in a shelter before giving birth and taking her daughter back to the Philippines. She then returned to Taiwan for a second time on her own to find work. Duhapa’s sacrifice is one of countless examples among the hundreds of thousands of migrant workers who sustain many of Taiwan’s households and factories,
RSS