When presenting his energy platform on Wednesday last week, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) mentioned that during his time as Taipei mayor, he rejected a NT$1 billion food (US$31 million) waste treatment plant project, saying that he never had food waste when eating, and he wanted to train Taipei residents to not leave food waste.
This matter provides three insights into Ko.
First, he was meant to propose an energy policy, but did not do his homework on biomass energy and complacently exposed his ignorance on the issue. Taichung Waipu Green Energy Ecological Park — the first biomass power plant in Taiwan that has been operating since July 2019 — can process more than 50,000 tonnes of food waste each year and generate approximately 6 million to 8.8 million kilowatt hours of electricity.
Second, based on his own limited knowledge (he could not tell the difference between leftovers and kitchen waste), he vetoed a decision making process that should have been approached from a professional perspective (such as investment benefit analysis, alternatives, etc.). This also reflects Ko’s tendency to simplify complex things.
Third, it reveals Ko’s patronizing mindset of “I know better than others.” Ko’s narcissistic character is reminiscent of another political figure, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). After Taiwan’s presidential election in January 2016, China’s China Review News Agency commented that Ma was “narcissistic, selfish, suspicious and unkind. Ma should bear the most responsibility for losing the election.”
A poll conducted by a pro-blue TV station on May 13, 2016, just before Ma stepped down, showed that the approval rate of Ma’s eight-year administration was only 23 percent, which was actually the highest during Ma’s second term. At its lowest, his approval rating dropped to as low as 11 percent. Another TV station’s poll had it as low as 9.2 percent, which led to the ridiculing of Ma as “Mr Nine Percent.”
This narcissistic defeated general still feels good about himself today and frequently tries to “instruct” the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and even the people in Taiwan.
Ko is no better than Ma. As early as the first anniversary of his inauguration as Taipei mayor, Ko’s KMT rival, Sean Lien (連勝文), a KMT vice chairman, said that Ko was “extraordinarily narcissistic.” Ko responded at the time that “narcissism is not easy to change, but it is not very serious,” followed by, in trademark Ko style: “This is not narcissism, it is self-confidence. It is true that Ko can be overconfident sometimes.”
Many of Ko’s supporters “expect a rule-breaker,” and Ko is that person. Indeed, Ko will bring about change, but what is more important is what it will be changed into. The change (breaking the rules) might not necessarily be an improvement — it might also be a change for the worse. The narcissistic Ko has given the answer after eight years as Taipei mayor. Do we really need to bet our future on the narcissistic Ko again — this time, the future of the entire country?
Wu Hai-ruei is a manager of a listed company.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS