Taiwanese writer and political commentator Kenneth C. Fan (范疇), who died on Monday at the age of 68, should be recognized and admired because of his steadfast anti-communist stance. Fan committed himself to defending and advocating for Taiwan’s democracy.
Fan was born in Taiwan. A graduate of National Taiwan University, he majored in philosophy. He also studied in Singapore. Fan worked in China and the US. Few political commentators were as versatile and experienced as he was. His remarks were not only weighty, but also persuasive.
Fan traveled to many countries and had the opportunity to become a citizen of Singapore, China and the US. After being abroad for almost four decades, he returned to Taiwan, where his roots were. He saw himself as Taiwanese and believed that every citizen should contribute to the country, for there is no such thing as a free lunch.
His definition of Taiwanese was based on pragmatism. It was not about blood ties or emotional feelings. As long as a person holds an ID card and passport issued by the Republic of China in Taiwan and pays taxes to the government as a citizen, they can be “Taiwanese” regardless of when they arrived.
His analysis of the fall of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was based on its violent control and financial revenue. Fan reminded Taiwan and the international community of the serious consequences resulting from the CCP’s fall. He warned people that they should be extra careful and prepared for changes brought by China.
Fan once criticized the overly bureaucratic system of government in Taiwan. He described it as a coat from China, a coat ungainly and highly impractical and one that needed to be tailored to meet Taiwan’s needs.
He supported Taiwan decoupling itself from China. At the same time, he said that the will of Taiwanese should be strengthened and Taiwan’s democratic work should be enhanced.
Taiwanese should not expect too much from politicians, especially in terms of their moral standards, he said.
Throughout his life, Fan examined political developments based on scientific analysis and on an objective stance. His affection for and identification with Taiwan, as well as his open-minded democratic values, serve as a significant principle for Taiwan to move forward into a new era.
His passing is a great loss, but Fan set an example for later generations to follow.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Emma Liu
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS