Taiwanese writer and political commentator Kenneth C. Fan (范疇), who died on Monday at the age of 68, should be recognized and admired because of his steadfast anti-communist stance. Fan committed himself to defending and advocating for Taiwan’s democracy.
Fan was born in Taiwan. A graduate of National Taiwan University, he majored in philosophy. He also studied in Singapore. Fan worked in China and the US. Few political commentators were as versatile and experienced as he was. His remarks were not only weighty, but also persuasive.
Fan traveled to many countries and had the opportunity to become a citizen of Singapore, China and the US. After being abroad for almost four decades, he returned to Taiwan, where his roots were. He saw himself as Taiwanese and believed that every citizen should contribute to the country, for there is no such thing as a free lunch.
His definition of Taiwanese was based on pragmatism. It was not about blood ties or emotional feelings. As long as a person holds an ID card and passport issued by the Republic of China in Taiwan and pays taxes to the government as a citizen, they can be “Taiwanese” regardless of when they arrived.
His analysis of the fall of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was based on its violent control and financial revenue. Fan reminded Taiwan and the international community of the serious consequences resulting from the CCP’s fall. He warned people that they should be extra careful and prepared for changes brought by China.
Fan once criticized the overly bureaucratic system of government in Taiwan. He described it as a coat from China, a coat ungainly and highly impractical and one that needed to be tailored to meet Taiwan’s needs.
He supported Taiwan decoupling itself from China. At the same time, he said that the will of Taiwanese should be strengthened and Taiwan’s democratic work should be enhanced.
Taiwanese should not expect too much from politicians, especially in terms of their moral standards, he said.
Throughout his life, Fan examined political developments based on scientific analysis and on an objective stance. His affection for and identification with Taiwan, as well as his open-minded democratic values, serve as a significant principle for Taiwan to move forward into a new era.
His passing is a great loss, but Fan set an example for later generations to follow.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Emma Liu
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and