Taiwanese writer and political commentator Kenneth C. Fan (范疇), who died on Monday at the age of 68, should be recognized and admired because of his steadfast anti-communist stance. Fan committed himself to defending and advocating for Taiwan’s democracy.
Fan was born in Taiwan. A graduate of National Taiwan University, he majored in philosophy. He also studied in Singapore. Fan worked in China and the US. Few political commentators were as versatile and experienced as he was. His remarks were not only weighty, but also persuasive.
Fan traveled to many countries and had the opportunity to become a citizen of Singapore, China and the US. After being abroad for almost four decades, he returned to Taiwan, where his roots were. He saw himself as Taiwanese and believed that every citizen should contribute to the country, for there is no such thing as a free lunch.
His definition of Taiwanese was based on pragmatism. It was not about blood ties or emotional feelings. As long as a person holds an ID card and passport issued by the Republic of China in Taiwan and pays taxes to the government as a citizen, they can be “Taiwanese” regardless of when they arrived.
His analysis of the fall of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was based on its violent control and financial revenue. Fan reminded Taiwan and the international community of the serious consequences resulting from the CCP’s fall. He warned people that they should be extra careful and prepared for changes brought by China.
Fan once criticized the overly bureaucratic system of government in Taiwan. He described it as a coat from China, a coat ungainly and highly impractical and one that needed to be tailored to meet Taiwan’s needs.
He supported Taiwan decoupling itself from China. At the same time, he said that the will of Taiwanese should be strengthened and Taiwan’s democratic work should be enhanced.
Taiwanese should not expect too much from politicians, especially in terms of their moral standards, he said.
Throughout his life, Fan examined political developments based on scientific analysis and on an objective stance. His affection for and identification with Taiwan, as well as his open-minded democratic values, serve as a significant principle for Taiwan to move forward into a new era.
His passing is a great loss, but Fan set an example for later generations to follow.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Emma Liu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its