Last month, 41 US states sued Meta Platforms Inc, accusing the parent company of Facebook and Instagram of knowingly and deliberately designing addictive features that harm children and contribute to young people’s mental health problems. The attorneys general of the states said in a joint lawsuit that Meta uses misleading marketing to foster addictive behavior in kids and teens and profit off them.
Meta is no stranger to lawsuits and controversy. From the US to Europe and Asia, the tech giant has been accused of multiple consumer protection, data privacy and antitrust contraventions over the years. However, the latest lawsuit is one of the largest of its kind and could have a greater-than-expected effect on social media companies as a whole if Meta is held accountable.
Moreover, it highlights a growing concern in the US about the phenomenon of social media addiction among adolescents. It also signals that legal action must be taken to address dependency on social media, as the impact on young people’s mental health is too serious to be ignored.
According to psychiatric experts, social media addiction refers to one’s behavior being inordinately concerned about social media or driven by an uncontrollable urge to use social media. By devoting so much time to social media, this behavioral addiction has negatively affected the daily lives of many children, with some even developing physical and mental health problems, experts say.
A study published in 2017 by the scientific journal PLOS One found that 4.5 percent of adolescents in the US had a social media addiction, with low self-esteem and high levels of depression. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reported in November 2021 that Facebook’s own research identified 12 percent of its users engaging in compulsive use of social media, which had affected their sleep, work, parenting or relationships.
Other studies in the US in recent years have also demonstrated that severe psychological problems — including depression, anxiety, insomnia, disruptions to education and daily life, and many other negative emotions — have resulted from excessive social media use by children. In the complaints filed by the US states against Meta, they said the company’s social media platforms “exploit psychological vulnerabilities of young users” to keep kids engaged in the networking sites for the next story, image or video, while “ignoring the next piece of social content could lead to social isolation.”
In Taiwan, a survey conducted by the Child Welfare League Foundation in late 2021 showed that 86.9 percent of adolescents reported experiencing “fear of missing out” (FOMO) from social media — far higher than the 69 percent recorded in separate surveys in the US.
FOMO refers to people who are always worried about whether they have missed any information, so they tend to spend more time scrolling social media out of a need to feel welcomed by others. Most importantly they cannot stop checking and refreshing networking sites. As the number of social media users increases, so does the number of people who experience FOMO.
Social media addiction has become a new epidemic of the century. It is hard to imagine that Taiwan would address this issue like the US by filing lawsuits against social media companies directly, therefore it requires collective efforts by individuals, parents and schools to help reduce the risks associated with the dangers of addictive behavior. While completely avoiding social media might be impossible for most people nowadays, setting time limits on social media usage and developing interests and hobbies are steps that could be taken to avoid addiction.
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,