“Too many people are coming,” German Chancellor Olaf Scholz recently said in an interview with weekly news magazine Der Spiegel.
The chancellor’s stern gaze on the cover underscored the seriousness of his proclamation: “We must finally deport on a large scale those who have no right to stay in Germany.”
Such an equivocal message from the head of Germany’s three-party coalition government is seen as a turning point in the domestic debate about migration, but in many ways, Scholz’s strong language reflects a deeper, long-simmering shift in policy.
In June, Scholz overruled opposition within his coalition and helped push through a major migration deal to overhaul the EU’s asylum procedures. The newly proposed rules would enable the EU to create processing centers on its external borders.
Addressing the German Bundestag, Scholz said that restructuring the “completely dysfunctional” European immigration system was a “historic” achievement.
More recently, Scholz’s government introduced draft legislation that would facilitate deportations by increasing the maximum length of predeportation custody and simplifying the procedure for removing convicted criminals, in addition to establishing temporary internal border controls to limit irregular migration.
Scholz also distanced himself from the decision to provide financial support to non-governmental organizations carrying out search-and-rescue operations in the Mediterranean, saying that the funds had been approved by parliament, not his government.
Such a drastic move away from the celebrated Willkommenskultur (welcoming culture) of 2015, when Germans flocked to train stations to welcome Syrian refugees, is largely driven by high levels of migration over the past few years.
Germany has long been the largest recipient of asylum seekers in the EU. The number of people seeking humanitarian protection in Germany increased by 1.14 million from 2021 to last year, one of the highest year-on-year increases since 2007, when the German Federal Statistical Office began reporting these data.
The trend has persisted this year, and, coupled with a looming recession and strained resources at the local level, it has fueled a tectonic shift in German public opinion. Concerns over immigration now cut across political lines, with 44 percent of Germans considering it the most important problem facing the country.
At the same time, nearly two-thirds of voters are dissatisfied with the coalition government, while polls indicate that the xenophobic Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD) has firmly established itself as Germany’s second-strongest party. This was obvious in recent state elections in Bavaria and Hesse: The government parties suffered significant losses, while the conservative Christian Democrats and the far-right AfD gained ground.
Already under pressure from the right, Scholz faces yet another political challenge: At the end of October, former far-left leader Sahra Wagenknecht announced the creation of a new party. Born and raised in East Germany and long a central figure of the post-communist The Left, Wagenknecht is known for her emphasis on working-class voters, her conservative social values, her criticism of military support for Ukraine — and her strident calls to limit migration.
In 2021, Wagenknecht, a frequent and eloquent guest on Germany’s talk shows, published an all-out literary assault on left-liberals — whom she calls the “self-righteous” — that became an instant bestseller.
According to polls, 27 percent of German voters would consider supporting her new party.
Against this backdrop, Scholz’s change of language on immigration is the equivalent of a frantic search for the emergency brake, but while inaction comes with a price, so does action. For example, his tough talk is almost certain to alienate the Green Party, a coalition partner that prides itself on welcoming migrants.
Scholz also faces a growing wave of criticism from within his own party ranks. The Social Democratic Party’s youth wing has pledged to resist the tightening of immigration rules, declaring that there is “no point in mimicking the right.”
Moreover, pushback from civil society, religious leaders and progressive media has in the past made it politically risky to pursue a more hardline stance on migration.
The escalating conflict in the Middle East has for the time being shifted the ground beneath this debate. Through a complex interplay of events, the war in Gaza has led many Germans to question previously sacrosanct immigration policies. As a result, polarization has given way to political consensus.
Hamas’s murder of more than 1,000 Israeli civilians outraged much of the German public. Yet many were shocked to learn that this sentiment was far from unanimous. A significant portion of Germany’s immigrant population, often with family connections to the Middle East and living in disadvantaged urban areas, had a radically different assessment and sympathies.
Since the Oct. 7 attack, the German Federal Association of Departments for Research and Information on Anti-Semitism has registered more than 200 anti-Semitic incidents in Germany, including an arson attack on a synagogue. In Berlin’s Neukolln neighborhood, an Islamic association gained notoriety for handing out sweets in the street to celebrate Hamas’ brutality.
For many Germans, the surge in anti-Semitism strikes at the heart of the country’s post-Holocaust identity: the idea of “never again.” At the same time, it serves as seemingly irrefutable evidence of the challenges of integration.
German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier echoed the general sentiment when he reminded the public that everyone “who lives here must know Auschwitz and understand the responsibility that our country has.”
Thus, in a surprising — and not necessarily nuanced — way, outrage over the conduct of a few has legitimized an about-face on migration policy that could affect thousands more. It is unclear whether this consensus will hold, or whether this dramatic shift in rhetoric and action will be enough to placate a concerned public.
For now, it is clear that Germany’s Willkommenskultur has become an unexpected casualty of the Israel-Hamas war.
Michael Broning serves on the basic values commission of Germany’s Social Democratic Party.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
The saga of Sarah Dzafce, the disgraced former Miss Finland, is far more significant than a mere beauty pageant controversy. It serves as a potent and painful contemporary lesson in global cultural ethics and the absolute necessity of racial respect. Her public career was instantly pulverized not by a lapse in judgement, but by a deliberate act of racial hostility, the flames of which swiftly encircled the globe. The offensive action was simple, yet profoundly provocative: a 15-second video in which Dzafce performed the infamous “slanted eyes” gesture — a crude, historically loaded caricature of East Asian features used in Western
Is a new foreign partner for Taiwan emerging in the Middle East? Last week, Taiwanese media reported that Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) secretly visited Israel, a country with whom Taiwan has long shared unofficial relations but which has approached those relations cautiously. In the wake of China’s implicit but clear support for Hamas and Iran in the wake of the October 2023 assault on Israel, Jerusalem’s calculus may be changing. Both small countries facing literal existential threats, Israel and Taiwan have much to gain from closer ties. In his recent op-ed for the Washington Post, President William
A stabbing attack inside and near two busy Taipei MRT stations on Friday evening shocked the nation and made headlines in many foreign and local news media, as such indiscriminate attacks are rare in Taiwan. Four people died, including the 27-year-old suspect, and 11 people sustained injuries. At Taipei Main Station, the suspect threw smoke grenades near two exits and fatally stabbed one person who tried to stop him. He later made his way to Eslite Spectrum Nanxi department store near Zhongshan MRT Station, where he threw more smoke grenades and fatally stabbed a person on a scooter by the roadside.
RSS