Everyone knows a leopard cannot change its spots. Why do people forget this when it comes to politics? It seems that humans have a terrible memory.
By nature, we are willing to turn a blind eye and sacrifice morality for personal gain, determined to win, by means fair or foul. In the end, all we achieve is a temporary victory, having lost sight of what really matters. Our nation and the next generation are being placed in jeopardy for the sake of getting what we want.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), its presidential candidate, consistently spouts nonsense and lies and, after entering politics, has continued to use discriminatory language. All of this displays his ignorance. His statements have garnered much attention, but also polluted our politics. His words conjure up the feeling of some bizarre creature, shocking and frightening. People are mesmerized by everything that comes out of his mouth and forget what they have known him to be.
As a surgeon, Ko was accused of live organ harvesting and crimes against humanity, which should have tipped us off that he was someone to be avoided. It has been a decade since Ko first ran for Taipei mayor. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the media and pundits still respect, embrace and collaborate with him. Why?
Out of political and personal need, hypocrites have chosen to ignore public welfare and justice. They are all complicit in endangering our nation.
The DPP, helping Ko win the 2014 local election and Taipei mayoral election, was the trigger, and for that it must take responsibility.
The KMT, now seeking an alliance with the TPP, is still willing to indulge this serial fabricator. The KMT should take a long, hard look at what it is about to do, and yet it seems hell-bent on doing just the opposite.
Few people in the media have publicly repented for the mistakes that have led us to this sorry impasse. Politicians, always on the lookout for their own personal benefit and sacrificing the good of the public, would be loath to accept responsibility or apologize for spawning this creature.
Taiwanese should consider their national dignity. Politicians and voters should not focus on short-term benefits. They should learn lessons from how they voluntarily or subconsciously engage in the invention of a political monster. It is high time that Ko be disqualified from interfering in political affairs. This is the most that we could hope to salvage from this litany of errors, just as garbage becomes valuable only after it is recycled and reused.
Ten Len-phone is a retired radio program host.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS