At the beginning of this month, Japanese Councilor Muneo Suzuki, who is known for his pro-Russia stance, visited Moscow. His behavior caused an uproar in Japan, given that the Japanese government has urged its citizens to refrain from traveling to Russia amid the Russo-Ukrainian war.
As the first Japanese lawmaker to visit Moscow since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February last year, Suzuki held talks with Russian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrey Rudenko and other officials. When interviewed by Russia’s state-owned news agency Sputnik, he said that he was 100 percent sure that Russia would win the war.
Although it was his opinion, Suzuki’s controversial statement could become propaganda for Russia. Japanese online accused him of betraying his country.
On Oct. 10, the Japan Innovation Party (JIP) expelled Suzuki for his unannounced Russia trip.
Suzuki hails from Hokkaido. Throughout his long political career, he has devoted himself to maintaining a friendly relationship with Russia. In April 2000, he visited Russia on behalf of then-Japanese prime minister Keizo Obuchi and met with then-Russian president-elect Vladimir Putin. It is generally believed that Suzuki was the first foreign politician Putin met after he won the election.
Suzuki naively thought that through his personal connections, Russia would be willing to give Japanese citizens permission to fish near the four southernmost Kuril Islands. He also believed that Russia would let Japanese who used to live on the four disputed islands return and pay tribute to their ancestors.
He was wrong.
Moscow and Russian officials responded to his wishes coldly. Snubbed, Suzuki could only return to Japan without achieving anything. Worse, he pushed his own country’s buttons.
According to the Sankei Shimbun, Suzuki’s trip this month should not be accepted because he publicly advocated for Russian aggression, with Moscow’s actions having been deemed a violation of international law.
An editorial in the Yomiuri Shimbun said that even though Suzuki is an opposition lawmaker, his reckless behavior went against the grain of Japan’s diplomatic policy and should not be tolerated.
During his most recent trip, Suzuki went along with Moscow’s official discourse and said that former Japanese prime minister Shinzo “Abe and Putin worked to create good Russia-Japan relations, but unfortunately in the last year, [Japanese] Prime Minister [Fumio] Kishida made things worse.”
Clearly, he broke diplomatic convention and disregarded one of the most important principles: “Politics stops at the water’s edge.”
In other words, when in Moscow, Suzuki revealed political problems at home to Russian officials, who would be able to use the reports to sow seeds of discord and polarization among Japanese politicians.
In this sense, Suzuki’s behavior cannot be considered a mere “different political opinion” in a democratic society. Neither his trip nor his remarks can be justified.
Suzuki has served eight consecutive terms as a lawmaker. He undoubtedly is a powerful leader of Japan’s local factions. His daughter, Takako Suzuki, who has been a Liberal Democratic Party lawmaker for four terms, is also an important figure. Because of his political power, the JIP did not rein him in.
The Yomiuri editorial said that Muneo Suzuki had more than once advocated for appeasing Russia, but his party did nothing to intervene or discipline him.
Possibly, given that he is a well-known politician, the party refrained from taking action against him for fear of harming itself.
As the editorial said, it was precisely because of the cadre in the JIP that Muneo Suzuki was given free rein, allowing him to become increasingly arrogant and opinionated.
He clearly damaged the national interests of Japan and the JIP has finally taken disciplinary action against him.
In Taiwan, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) has been accused of leaking classified material about the Indigenous Defense Submarine program to a foreign state.
However, the KMT has repeatedly defended and protected her. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) has not commented on the issue and the party’s “blue fighters” faction continues to list her as a member.
This should have sounded alarm bells. Clearly, Ma and her friends will soon be eliminated by voters.
Chen Yung-chang is a company manager.
Translated by Emma Liu
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS