Rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are boosting online disinformation and enabling governments to increase censorship and surveillance in a growing threat to human rights, a US non-profit said in a report published on Wednesday.
Global Internet freedom fell for the 13th consecutive year, with China, Myanmar and Iran having the worst conditions of the 70 countries surveyed by the Freedom on the Net report, which highlighted the risks posed by easy access to generative AI technology.
AI allows governments to “enhance and refine online censorship” and amplify digital repression, making surveillance, and the creation and spread of disinformation faster, cheaper, and more effective, the annual report by Freedom House said.
“AI can be used to supercharge censorship, surveillance, and the creation and spread of disinformation,” Freedom House president Michael Abramowitz said. “Advances in AI are amplifying a crisis for human rights online.”
By some estimates, AI-generated content could soon account for 99 percent or more of all information on the internet, overwhelming content moderation systems that are already struggling to keep up with the deluge of misinformation, tech experts say.
Governments have been slow to respond, with few countries passing legislation for the ethical use of AI, while also justifying the use of AI-based surveillance technologies, such as facial recognition, on the grounds of security.
Generative AI-based tools were used in at least 16 countries to distort information on political or social issues from June last year to May this year, the Freedom House report said, adding that the figure is likely an undercount.
Meanwhile, in at least 22 countries, social media companies were required to use automated systems for content moderation to comply with censorship rules.
With at least 65 national-level elections taking place next year, including in Indonesia, India and the US, misinformation can have major repercussions, with deepfakes already popping up from New Zealand to Turkey.
“Generative AI offers sophistication and scale to spread misinformation on a level that was previously unimaginable — it is a force multiplier of misinformation,” said Karen Rebelo, deputy editor at BOOM Live, a Mumbai-based fact-checking organization.
While AI is a “military-grade weapon in the hands of bad actors,” in India political parties and their proxies are the biggest spreaders of misinformation and disinformation, she said, and it is not in their interest to regulate AI.
While companies such as OpenAI and Google have imposed safeguards to reduce some overtly harmful uses of their AI-based chatbots, these can be easily breached, Freedom House said.
Even if deepfakes are quickly exposed, they can “undermine public trust in democratic processes, incentivize activists and journalists to self-censor, and drown out reliable and independent reporting,” the report said.
“AI-generated imagery ... can also entrench polarization and other existing tensions. In extreme cases, it could galvanize violence against individuals or whole communities,” it added.
For all its pitfalls, AI technology can be enormously beneficial, so long as governments regulate its use and enact strong data privacy laws, while also requiring better misinformation-detection tools and safeguards for human rights, the report said.
“When designed and deployed safely and fairly, AI can help people evade authoritarian censorship, counter disinformation, and document human rights abuses,” said Allie Funk, Freedom House’s research director for technology and democracy.
For example, AI is being increasingly used in fact checking and to analyze satellite imagery, social media posts and images to flag human rights abuses in conflict zones.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
RSS