The nation’s first domestically made submarine, named the Hai Kun (海鯤), or “Narwhal,” had its commissioning ceremony at shipbuilder CSBC Corp’s Kaohsiung dockyard last week.
As the first indigenous defense submarine prototype, it still requires many modifications and final testing.
However, information leaks and corruption allegations surrounding the program have been making news headlines, causing furor and confusion among the general public. The Ministry of National Defense and prosecutors should quickly get to the bottom of the matter.
On another note, pro-China supporters, political commentators and retired generals have been prattling on political talk shows about their opposition to the submarine program, such as how Taiwan’s peripheral oceanic geography is unsuitable for large submarines since the Taiwan Strait, with an area of 80,000km2 and shallow depths, is only suited for small submarine activity, but not for large ones. Satellites would also reveal the whereabouts of submarines around the Taiwan Strait, they said.
Various fear mongering narratives have brushed aside the fact that submarines are an extension of national defense, not to mention they could launch torpedoes and missiles to deter scorched-earth attacks by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army against Taiwan proper.
If war were ever to erupt between China and Taiwan, it would be totally different in nature from the land warfare taking place in Ukraine. Once maritime and air traffic are blocked, supplies from other countries would be cut off. Therefore, submarine ordinance would be better stored in friendly neighboring countries.
In the event of a war, military submarines could land at foreign docks for resupply and not lose combat power due to a surface-level blockade of military aid. The US’ Taiwan Relations Act and US President Joe Biden’s promise to defend Taiwan, along with the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the US and Japan, should be able to ensure the realization of this deployment.
As Taiwan prepares for asymmetric warfare in the face of Chinese threats, modern submarines play a significant role in defending Taiwan and thereby should never be vilified nor tarnished.
Fang Ping-sheng is a former major in the Republic of China Marine Corps.
Translated by Rita Wang
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS