US President Joe Biden on Monday at the US-Pacific Islands Forum at the White House announced that the US recognizes the Cook Islands and Niue as “sovereign and independent” states, and pledged to open diplomatic relations, while reiterating that “the history and the future of the Pacific islands and the United States are inextricably linked,” news reports said.
Is Taiwan any less worthy than those two for the US to recognize its sovereignty?
The Cook Islands is a group of 15 islands with a combined land area of about 240km2 and a population of about 170,000. Niue covers about 261km2 and had a population of 1,689 last year.
Both are small island countries with tiny populations, so it is commendable that the US, the leader of the democratic world, is willing to recognize their sovereignty and respect their existential right to establish official diplomatic ties.
However, Taiwan’s land area and population are 72 times and 1,240 times larger than the Cook Islands and Niue combined, not to mention that Taiwan has all the key elements of a nation-state: a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and sovereignty.
Aside from hitting back at China with “Taiwan is not part of China” or “UN Resolution 2758 does not concern the representation of Taiwan,” what is Taiwan to the White House exactly?
Taiwan’s national power is on par with other top countries in the global community, not to mention being one of the leading nations in Asia. Its GDP, economy, foreign exchange reserves, education, healthcare and democracy are strong, while US-based Freedom House gave it a score of 94 out of 100 in its Freedom in the World report in March.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s chips, Largan Precision Co’s cellphone lenses, Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc’s integrated circuit assembly and Giant’s bicycles are all world-class products.
Unfortunately, Taiwan even tops the world for number of Chinese incursions into its air defense identification zone.
Biden and his team should be more than aware that Taiwan would bring further stability and peace to the world if it could participate in global organizations and events as a sovereign democratic country instead of being diplomatically isolated.
Even the British House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee has for the first time referred to Taiwan as an “independent country” in an official document, breaking a political taboo as British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs James Cleverly visited Beijing.
“Taiwan is already an independent country, under the name Republic of China,” the committee said.
If the British parliament could acknowledge Taiwan as an independent country, why not the US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs?
More importantly, if Taiwan falls into the clutches of communist China, it would not only be tragic for Taiwan, but another serious loss to the democratic camp.
Only by taking the first step and recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign country can there be hope of establishing official diplomatic ties and silencing anti-US propagandists.
I look forward to the day when the US president can bestow upon Taiwan the recognition that it deserves: a sovereign and independent state whose history and the future and the US are inextricably linked.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education.
Translated by Rita Wang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS