At the end of March, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), along with a few securities and futures agencies, released the Corporate Governance 4.0: Sustainable Development Action Plan. In this document, gender equality is highlighted as one of the main criteria for companies in Taiwan.
The plan said that all listed and over-the-counter (OTC) companies would have to include at least one female board member. If a company fails to meet the standard, it would be barred from participating in an initial public offering (IPO) or stock launch. Clearly, officials have paid great attention to gender issues when outlining the corporate governance plan. Corporations and financial agencies have been discussing such a trend and ways of handling it.
Regarding the inclusion of women in corporate boards, officials of the Securities and Futures Bureau of the FSC stated that companies should increase their number of female board members. This is a standard in line with the international community. The board members would be more diversified and gender equality can be promoted. Therefore, having a female board member would become a prerequisite for an organization to launch an IPO.
Moreover, the corporate boards of all listed and OTC companies should have at least one female board member by next year.
As of now, 163 companies do not meet the standard and they are required to improve their status next year.
In response to this plan, some market participants believe that although the issue of gender equality is significant, a person’s ability should be emphasized more. The requirement to them is somewhat unreasonable and might cause inconvenience for some companies.
I would also like to shed light on a potential problem in this plan: the issue of aging. Many corporate leaders in Taiwan are in their 80s or 90s. Recent news reports have said that when one of the Far Eastern Group’s most important leaders, Chang Tsai-hsiung (張才雄), announced his retirement, he was almost 100 years old.
Despite his age, he is still a board member of a few listed and OTC companies. In Japan and South Korea, more than 30 percent of the people who are over 65 continue to work; in Taiwan, the number is only 6 percent.
As we are becoming an aging society. Those who are over 65 are likely to continue to work, as has happened in other countries. To cope with the situation, regulations regarding both aging and corporate governance should be revised as early as possible.
For instance, the statutory retirement age of 65 and the age for claiming pensions can both be raised. Official agencies can also come up with more incentives for the elderly to continue their careers.
In fact, the government should start considering providing more incentives now, so that corporate boards would treat their senior members with respect, and in turn, seniors can offer their valuable experience for their entire company.
The issue of aging would only become increasingly more serious in our society, and it must be addressed alongside the plan of corporate governance.
I would not say that my methods are the correct ones, but I would like to shed light on this issue, and here are my two cents for further discussion.
Cheng Ming-te is a professor in Taipei City University of Science and Technology’s department of business administration.
Translated by Emma Liu
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS