Shopping might be the most capitalist of all activities. Little wonder, then, that where we shop reflects capitalism back to us, capturing the zeitgeist of an era or a country: Think Walmart Inc’s ascension as a metaphor for the unbridled consumption of post-Cold War US.
Nowhere is this truer than Japan’s department stores — once a staple of travel-guide tropes about elevator girls, white-gloved assistants and incomparable service. Their history traces capitalism’s trajectory in the country, right from when Echigoya, a predecessor of today’s Mitsukoshi that traces its roots back to 1673, became the first place to sell goods at fixed prices instead of haggling.
The hyakkaten, as they are known, later absorbed Western practices such as point-of-sale displays and double-entry accounting, as stores were inspired in the early 1900s by the likes of Wanamaker’s or Harrods. These were places where people visited to encounter state-of-the-art technology such as elevators, and by the height of the economic bubble in the late 1980s they were symbols of the country’s might, an essential destination for the newly wealthy. When the bubble burst, no industry was harder hit.
More recently, Sogo & Seibu Co made headlines after workers went on a historic strike last month to protest its sale to US fund Fortress Investment Group. Japanese workers striking is, in and of itself, unusual. Perhaps it is a barometer for a country with a shrinking workforce, one where labor finds itself with an increasingly louder voice.
However, the sale also encapsulates the changes afoot in Japanese business. A once-cherished national asset, whose fate was not so long ago debated in parliament and entwined with the fortunes of premiers, is now sold with relatively little outcry to what might once have termed a “vulture fund” in the press. Furthermore, the pressure to sell came from another foreign investor, the activist ValueAct Capital Management LP, which forced the board of owner Seven & i Holdings Co to let its treasured but troubled asset go.
For a country often accused of not changing, that is a remarkable turnaround, but it is far from the only time Sogo and Seibu have been at the inflection point of how business renews itself. Sogo Co’s bankruptcy in 2000 was one of the biggest stories during then-prime minister Yoshiro Mori’s frenetic reign. Like so many firms in the 1980s, Sogo had taken on debt that it expected to be backed by its overvalued assets. When its balance sheet was exposed, Mori initially pledged to use taxpayer money to salvage the chain, but he backtracked amid increasing opposition to rescues of “zombie” companies.
Sogo filed for bankruptcy with liabilities of US$17 billion, the second-biggest corporate failure in the country’s history at the time. The fallout prevented the then-governor of the Bank of Japan, Masaru Hayami, from raising interest rates off zero that month.
Allowing Sogo’s failure was a watershed moment. The Mori government “has made the smartest financial decision of its brief political life,” BusinessWeek said at the time. The era of bailing out failing firms was (mostly) over, paving the way for tougher measures. Instead of the government, rival Seibu Department Stores Ltd stepped up to support Sogo’s revival. It was not long, though, before Seibu had debt troubles of its own. The solution, arranged by bankers and creditors, was a merger from weakness of the two struggling firms.
Other peers followed: Isetan and Mitsukoshi formed the conglomerate that today bears their names; Matsuzakaya and Daimaru formed J Front Retailing Co; Osaka railway operators Hankyu and Hanshin, which pioneered placing department stores in train hubs, merged along with their retail units, becoming H2O Retailing Corp. That firm, in turn, agreed to join with Takashimaya Co, but failed to reach an agreement. That, too, echoes the business environment then, when combinations that made sense on paper — such as beermakers Kirin Holdings Co and Suntory Holdings Ltd or industrial conglomerates Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd and Hitachi Ltd — were discussed, but ultimately fell through.
Japan’s department stores have stabilized since, with Seven & i buying Sogo & Seibu in 2006, but the industry’s long-delayed restructuring put them on a weaker footing. The debt was partly due to opening across Asia at the wrong time — and, because of their busted balance sheets, they gave away those assets too quickly. The Sogo in Hong Kong is iconic even today, but it is owned and operated by tycoon Thomas Lau (劉鑾鴻), after the parent company sold its international assets during restructuring. Focusing on domestic operations to the detriment of opportunities overseas was a common error of Japanese business in the 2000s from mobile phones to television panels.
Today, concerns lie not only over the jobs in Sogo & Seibu’s remaining domestic outlets, but also the fate of the department store experience. At the flagship Ikebukuro location, electronics retailer Yodobashi Holdings Co intends to occupy much of the floorspace. The specter of an electronics retailer’s blinding lights and constant jingles occupying the hyakkaten has even led Norbert Leuret, the local head of LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, to voice his opposition.
However, discount electronics outlets, or Pan Pacific International Holdings Corp’s Don Quijote discount chain, are more synonymous with Japan now — a reflection maybe of how the country is shifting to a cheap shopping destination rather than a premium one. Young domestic customers are far more likely to buy online from the likes of Chinese clothing giant Shein; apparel sales at department stores plunged to just ￥1.1 trillion (US$7.4 billion) in 2020 from ￥3.9 trillion in 1990. That is one reason the number of department stores located outside the 10 biggest cities has dropped by 30 percent in the past decade.
However, one curiosity is that some of the largest stores are doing better than anticipated: Isetan Mitsukoshi Holdings Ltd’s flagship Shinjuku Isetan posted its best-ever annual sales last fiscal year, surpassing a 1991 peak; Osaka’s Hankyu Umeda had a record 12 months, too. Tourists had only just returned post-COVID-19 for a portion of that time, with big-spending Chinese visitors hardly at all.
That success, then, might be a reflection of where wealth has shifted firmly to the biggest urban hubs. As more of Japan eschews the “job for life” model and toward rewarding performance, this two-track economy is likely to accelerate. As the nation changes, so too would the hyakkaten. It is not closing time yet.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS