In the public mind, the vice presidency is probably a decorative position. High-ranking yet without any executive power in the real sense, vice presidents are often underestimated by the public, so much so that former US president John Adams once described the vice presidency as “the most insignificant office that ever the invention of man contrived, or his imagination conceived.”
However, over the course of history, the position of vice president has been elevated, with candidates now needing to fit the bill of being both a reliable partner and a counterbalance to the president.
As the first in line to succeed the president, a vice president should be able to deal with national crises or policies in the event that the president is declared incapable of carrying out the duties of the office.
Independent presidential candidate Terry Gou (郭台銘) dropped a bombshell when he named actress Tammy Lai (賴佩霞), known for her role in the Netflix political drama Wave Makers (人選之人), as his running mate for the election in January next year.
In his announcement, Gou touted Lai’s educational background at Harvard Kennedy School, which Lai later clarified as a “short-term” online course, not a full diploma as people had thought. Lai’s portfolio also includes a professional qualification in hypnotherapy and a doctorate in law from China’s Jinan University, a school that has direct associations with the United Front Work Department.
Even though education is not the only criterion for assessing a person’s capabilities, it does say much about the cards that the person can bring to the table. As Lai is running for vice president, it is only reasonable that the public asks for more than hypnosis, acting and legal knowledge as a skill set.
Lai’s eligibility has also been questioned because of her dual nationality as she has US citizenship — an issue that caused a furor in previous elections, such as the controversy over former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) US green card.
If a candidate cannot prove one’s loyalty to the nation with basic citizenship, they should not be allowed to stand for the top job.
So far, Lai’s nomination seems to have failed to work its magic for Gou. Most vice presidents are chosen to balance their party’s ticket — be in terms of geography, expertise or ideology — but Lai so far has no counterbalancing qualities to Gou other than gender.
In the 2016 presidential election, President Tsai Ing-wen, who has a legal background, chose Chen Chien-jen, who has public health expertise; the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate, Eric Chu, who has an accounting background, chose Wang Ju-hsuan (王如玄), who has a legal background; and People First Party candidate James Soong, a political veteran, picked Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), who has a science background.
In terms of geographical considerations, Chu’s major support base was in northern Taiwan, while Wang had her roots in Chiayi County. Hsu, born in Hsinchu, was expected to bring in Hakka votes. Chen was expected to garner the votes of local factions in Kaohsiung.
As Gou is a political neophyte himself, he should have chosen a political veteran to be his running mate instead of someone who looks glamorous, yet lacks political experience. In this way, he could have persuaded the public that he is serious about his campaign, instead of creating doubts that it is just an act to satisfy his vanity or for the thrill of it. Perhaps this is the reason why his support ratings are still lagging way behind the other three candidates.
It is true that the vice presidency can be “insignificant,” but for the public, it is not a minor position that should be taken lightly.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS