Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) has been under the political spotlight this week as new allegations of ethical misconduct continued to surface.
During her election campaign last year, Kao, a former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislator-at-large, was accused of receiving paid leave from the Institute for Information Industry (III) while studying abroad and partly plagiarizing published III-funded studies she coauthored into her doctoral dissertation.
Kao’s legislative assistants also accused her of payroll fraud by forcing them to “donate” part of their salaries and overtime pay to a common fund, which was allegedly later used by Kao. She was indicted last month on charges of misusing public funds and making public officials write false entries in public documents.
Scandals began surfacing when Kao visited Japan on Sept. 4, after the city government suddenly announced personnel changes, involving Hsinchu deputy mayor Tsai Li-ching (蔡麗清), Hsinchu Cultural Affairs Bureau director Chien Kang-ming (錢康明), who resigned on Sept. 11, and Shih Shu-ting (施淑婷), who became head of the department of civil affairs.
After Kao reportedly asked Tsai and Chien “to resign,” over the following days, city councilors said Kao had been driving luxury vehicles and living in a property developer-owned apartment costing more than NT$50 million (US$1.57 million). Shih, also a TPP member, is the owner of one of the vehicles; she failed to declare the assets of her husband, a property developer who donated to Kao.
On Sept. 11, Chien hinted online that Kao’s “good friend” — referring to her boyfriend Lee Chung-ting (李忠庭) — had meddled in municipal affairs, including New Year’s Eve celebration plans and asking Chien to resign, yet Lee issued a statement the same day denying Chien’s claim, arguing that he rented the apartment at a reasonable market price.
Kao and Lee denied the recent allegations, but Kao on Friday apologized for the controversies and said that all city government officials should not interact with Lee in any way, or they will face punishment — seemingly implying that Lee had been “talking” to officials.
The allegations have raised questions about Kao’s ethics, including her ability to manage conflicts of interest and separating her public and private affairs, sparking discussions about impacts on the TPP and the reputation of its chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
In last year’s mayoral election, Ko and independent presidential candidate and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) endorsed Kao; the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is also widely believed to have secretly endorsed her, as it did not strongly back its own candidate, Lin Keng-jen (林耕仁), when he made accusations against Kao; the head of Lin’s support group even urged voters to vote for Kao to “remove the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) from power.”
After Kao’s indictment, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) showed his support, saying he believes the law will prove her innocence; Gou said the judiciary should not be used for political suppression. Ko said he believes Kao did not have corrupt intent.
While the KMT and Chu have called for a “non-green” alliance, aiming to work with the TPP and alienate Gou, to “remove the DPP from power” in next year’s presidential election, the TPP and Ko have prided themselves on bringing a “new political paradigm” that values public over individual or party interests and aims to build a government “free from corruption.”
The gap between Hsinchu voters’ high expectations for Kao as a “refreshing” political figure and her disappointing performance and controversies might serve as a warning of the risky consequences of a coalition founded with the sole goal of “removing the DPP from power.”
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS