Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) has been under the political spotlight this week as new allegations of ethical misconduct continued to surface.
During her election campaign last year, Kao, a former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislator-at-large, was accused of receiving paid leave from the Institute for Information Industry (III) while studying abroad and partly plagiarizing published III-funded studies she coauthored into her doctoral dissertation.
Kao’s legislative assistants also accused her of payroll fraud by forcing them to “donate” part of their salaries and overtime pay to a common fund, which was allegedly later used by Kao. She was indicted last month on charges of misusing public funds and making public officials write false entries in public documents.
Scandals began surfacing when Kao visited Japan on Sept. 4, after the city government suddenly announced personnel changes, involving Hsinchu deputy mayor Tsai Li-ching (蔡麗清), Hsinchu Cultural Affairs Bureau director Chien Kang-ming (錢康明), who resigned on Sept. 11, and Shih Shu-ting (施淑婷), who became head of the department of civil affairs.
After Kao reportedly asked Tsai and Chien “to resign,” over the following days, city councilors said Kao had been driving luxury vehicles and living in a property developer-owned apartment costing more than NT$50 million (US$1.57 million). Shih, also a TPP member, is the owner of one of the vehicles; she failed to declare the assets of her husband, a property developer who donated to Kao.
On Sept. 11, Chien hinted online that Kao’s “good friend” — referring to her boyfriend Lee Chung-ting (李忠庭) — had meddled in municipal affairs, including New Year’s Eve celebration plans and asking Chien to resign, yet Lee issued a statement the same day denying Chien’s claim, arguing that he rented the apartment at a reasonable market price.
Kao and Lee denied the recent allegations, but Kao on Friday apologized for the controversies and said that all city government officials should not interact with Lee in any way, or they will face punishment — seemingly implying that Lee had been “talking” to officials.
The allegations have raised questions about Kao’s ethics, including her ability to manage conflicts of interest and separating her public and private affairs, sparking discussions about impacts on the TPP and the reputation of its chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
In last year’s mayoral election, Ko and independent presidential candidate and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) endorsed Kao; the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is also widely believed to have secretly endorsed her, as it did not strongly back its own candidate, Lin Keng-jen (林耕仁), when he made accusations against Kao; the head of Lin’s support group even urged voters to vote for Kao to “remove the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) from power.”
After Kao’s indictment, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) showed his support, saying he believes the law will prove her innocence; Gou said the judiciary should not be used for political suppression. Ko said he believes Kao did not have corrupt intent.
While the KMT and Chu have called for a “non-green” alliance, aiming to work with the TPP and alienate Gou, to “remove the DPP from power” in next year’s presidential election, the TPP and Ko have prided themselves on bringing a “new political paradigm” that values public over individual or party interests and aims to build a government “free from corruption.”
The gap between Hsinchu voters’ high expectations for Kao as a “refreshing” political figure and her disappointing performance and controversies might serve as a warning of the risky consequences of a coalition founded with the sole goal of “removing the DPP from power.”
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
RSS