The 18th G20 summit took place in New Delhi, presided over by India with the theme “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam,” a Sanskrit phrase that means “the world is one family.”
This was an occasion for world leaders to chart a plan to promote world peace, security and development. In doing so, G20 member countries held detailed discussions and issued a joint declaration covering important issues, including promoting strong, sustainable, balanced and inclusive growth; unlocking trade; ensuring well-managed, regular and skills-based migration pathways; advancing financial inclusion; fighting corruption; accelerating progress on sustainable development goals; delivering on climate and sustainable finance and reinvigorating multilateralism.
Mention of these issues in the G20 New Delhi Leaders’ Declaration is significant, but the summit also attracted global attention due to the absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Xi’s decision to not attend the G20 summit did not happen suddenly. His absence was due to domestic and international factors.
First, China has faced an unprecedented economic slowdown this year, which necessitated Xi remaining in China.
Second, the removal of two People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) generals, the disappearance of former Chinese minister of foreign affairs Qin Gang (秦剛) and the mysterious death of PLARF deputy commander Wu Guohua (吳國華) have underlined the deepening mistrust between political leadership and other government organs and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Third, these developments led CCP elders to reprimand Xi at the Beidaihe meeting, warning him of possible loss of public support. Thus, protecting his position as the CCP’s undisputed leader was instrumental in his decision to not attend the G20.
Fourth, the deplorable relationship between China and India since the Galwan military skirmishes in 2020 was another compelling factor for Xi to stay away. The two countries’ relationship has become so fragile that China even objected to India’s decision to use Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam as the summit theme.
Xi’s regime also expressed opposition to some of the G20 ministerial meetings being held in Kashmir and Arunachal Pradesh. As its objection did not attract any attention from other G20 members, Beijing felt isolated and humiliated.
Fifth, as China is wary of deepening India-US ties, Xi felt overshadowed by the strong bonhomie enjoyed by US President Joe Biden and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Lastly, Xi perhaps felt his absence would spoil India’s successful G20 summit presiding.
Xi’s decision backfired as India succeeded in projecting itself as a champion of the Global South. The African Union’s inclusion into the group would further prove to be a game changer in promoting an equitable world order, limiting China’s imperialist goals in Africa.
G20 expansion would not only bolster world order democratization, but also impact China-led groupings, such as BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.
China has realized that the US wants to contain China’s influence in the Indo-Pacific and other regions through the G20 and other similar groups.
In a blunt reference to China and Russia, the G20 declaration said that all states must act in a manner consistent with the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter in its entirety; all states must refrain from threats or use of force to seek territorial acquisition against the territorial integrity and sovereignty or political independence of any state. The use or threat of nuclear weapons use is unacceptable.
This move is important in the context of the war in Ukraine, as well as China’s assertive posturing against Taiwan, India and other nearby countries.
At the same time, with the aim of challenging Xi’s pet project, the Belt and Road Initiative, Saudi Arabia, the EU, India, the UAE, France, Germany, Italy and the US committed to work together to establish the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC).
The IMEC is expected to spur economic development via enhanced connectivity and economic integration between Asia, the Persian Gulf and Europe. It also indicates how wary the rest of the world is of China’s vision of a world order.
While the G20 summit in New Delhi has crystallized its aim to achieve a free, open and transparent world order, it should be hoped that this grouping will soon realize the necessity of bringing Taiwan into its fold to form an inclusive global society in a true sense.
Sumit Kumar is an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Delhi, and a former Ministry of Foreign Affairs visiting fellow at National Chengchi University.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS