Foxconn Technology Group has finally joined titans Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Apple Inc in predicting a worsening outlook for the year as a rebound in demand for gadgets fails to materialize. Rather than hunker down though, the maker of smartphones, computers and artificial intelligence servers is spending more to accelerate its global migration.
At its peak, Foxconn employed 1 million workers in a single Chinese city to assemble iPhones. Both the Taiwanese electronics giant and its chief client hung on to that operations model because it was efficient and effective. Those days are over. Recent announcements show Foxconn is committed to expansion despite the downturn and myriad challenges in setting up overseas.
China no longer offers advantages in labor, logistics and reliability and having most of one’s workforce in one place has turned from a strength to a weakness. What replaces Foxconn’s former mega-factory strategy will have huge ramifications for multibillion dollar industries, geopolitics and the world’s largest economies.
We know for sure that Foxconn will never return to the days when it manufactured almost the entire supply of a hit product in one location. While the company owns and runs the factories, Apple calls the shots when it comes to deciding which products are made and where. Apple’s seeming reticence to move away from China may stem from a deal the Cupertino-based company reportedly made with Beijing to continue procurement in return for the US company being allowed to keep selling products there, as the Information previously reported.
Agreements that are similar in tenor, but which may differ in scope have since been worked out with New Delhi, allowing Apple to open its own stores in India and paving the way for mostly Taiwanese assemblers to expand capacity on the subcontinent. A combination of carrots and sticks under Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s broad “Make in India” policy appear to have had the desired effect.
In India alone, Foxconn has nine campuses across the equivalent of 500 football fields operating more than 30 factories. Revenue from the South Asian nation runs at about US$10 billion annually, and Foxconn chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) predicts investment there would top several billions of US dollars in the coming years.
Despite this, India will not replace China as the center of global electronics manufacturing. No one will. Vietnam, Mexico, Brazil, Thailand and even the Czech Republic could all lay claim to being a future production hub, with each offering their own unique mix of cheap and abundant labor, infrastructure, proximity to end markets and logistical advantages.
Instead, Foxconn is splitting the difference and has picked the right time to ramp up its investments outside China by spreading the money around the planet. Rather than one or two massive facilities employing hundreds of thousands, we can expect dozens of locations to operate in a hub-and-spoke model comprising factories that utilize tens of thousands of staff apiece.
Foxconn’s flagship, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, on Monday announced a 30 percent drop in second-quarter operating income after revenue fell 14 percent, the largest drop in a decade. As recently as May, Foxconn predicted that revenue this year would be flat. Growth in computing products was meant to offset weakness in its consumer electronics division, which includes smartphones. However, now revenue from computing and also cloud and networking is expected to fall. As a result, Foxconn cannot avoid a decline in revenue for the full year.
This weakness could end up being the perfect opportunity to focus on migration. It is very hard to think about shifting production when management attention and industrial equipment are flat out trying to fulfill quotas for iPhones. Yet fallow times mean idle machines can be shipped when they are not in use, and factory bosses can think about setting up new lines.
In the past five months alone, the Taipei-based company has announced more than US$1.1 billion of investments into India, Vietnam and Thailand. This includes purchasing 2 million square meters of land in India’s Bengaluru and Telangana, and 480,000m2 in northern Vietnam. In addition, it bought more than US$33 million in machinery directly from Apple to be deployed in India, and a further US$41 million went into its Thai electric vehicle (EV) joint venture Horizon Plus.
There is also a pledge to spend US$780 million over five years in Kaohsiung to make it a hub of EV development and pumped another US$90 million into a US holding company which manages its investment in Wisconsin.
Put together, these are not the spending patterns of a company sitting still or resting on its China laurels. The broad spread of investment locations also recognizes that none alone can be relied upon to replace the mega factories it operates in China’s Shenzhen and Zhengzhou, which will both remain important manufacturing hubs for years to come.
Foxconn’s slow pace of migration outside of China until now, and especially the company’s cautious expansion in India, can easily be viewed as reticence or even as a setback. Instead, what needs to be remembered is that Foxconn built its significant footprint in Shenzhen and later Zhengzhou over a span of 40 years, with continued and unified support across all levels of the Chinese government. It is fanciful to expect any company to replicate such success within a far more raucous and unpredictable nation within a few years.
However, with China’s grip on the global supply chain loosening, and worldwide demand in retreat, now is an opportune time for the company to move forward with its plans to rewrite its business model.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology in Asia. Previously, he was a technology reporter for Bloomberg News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had