Foxconn Technology Group has finally joined titans Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Apple Inc in predicting a worsening outlook for the year as a rebound in demand for gadgets fails to materialize. Rather than hunker down though, the maker of smartphones, computers and artificial intelligence servers is spending more to accelerate its global migration.
At its peak, Foxconn employed 1 million workers in a single Chinese city to assemble iPhones. Both the Taiwanese electronics giant and its chief client hung on to that operations model because it was efficient and effective. Those days are over. Recent announcements show Foxconn is committed to expansion despite the downturn and myriad challenges in setting up overseas.
China no longer offers advantages in labor, logistics and reliability and having most of one’s workforce in one place has turned from a strength to a weakness. What replaces Foxconn’s former mega-factory strategy will have huge ramifications for multibillion dollar industries, geopolitics and the world’s largest economies.
We know for sure that Foxconn will never return to the days when it manufactured almost the entire supply of a hit product in one location. While the company owns and runs the factories, Apple calls the shots when it comes to deciding which products are made and where. Apple’s seeming reticence to move away from China may stem from a deal the Cupertino-based company reportedly made with Beijing to continue procurement in return for the US company being allowed to keep selling products there, as the Information previously reported.
Agreements that are similar in tenor, but which may differ in scope have since been worked out with New Delhi, allowing Apple to open its own stores in India and paving the way for mostly Taiwanese assemblers to expand capacity on the subcontinent. A combination of carrots and sticks under Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s broad “Make in India” policy appear to have had the desired effect.
In India alone, Foxconn has nine campuses across the equivalent of 500 football fields operating more than 30 factories. Revenue from the South Asian nation runs at about US$10 billion annually, and Foxconn chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) predicts investment there would top several billions of US dollars in the coming years.
Despite this, India will not replace China as the center of global electronics manufacturing. No one will. Vietnam, Mexico, Brazil, Thailand and even the Czech Republic could all lay claim to being a future production hub, with each offering their own unique mix of cheap and abundant labor, infrastructure, proximity to end markets and logistical advantages.
Instead, Foxconn is splitting the difference and has picked the right time to ramp up its investments outside China by spreading the money around the planet. Rather than one or two massive facilities employing hundreds of thousands, we can expect dozens of locations to operate in a hub-and-spoke model comprising factories that utilize tens of thousands of staff apiece.
Foxconn’s flagship, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, on Monday announced a 30 percent drop in second-quarter operating income after revenue fell 14 percent, the largest drop in a decade. As recently as May, Foxconn predicted that revenue this year would be flat. Growth in computing products was meant to offset weakness in its consumer electronics division, which includes smartphones. However, now revenue from computing and also cloud and networking is expected to fall. As a result, Foxconn cannot avoid a decline in revenue for the full year.
This weakness could end up being the perfect opportunity to focus on migration. It is very hard to think about shifting production when management attention and industrial equipment are flat out trying to fulfill quotas for iPhones. Yet fallow times mean idle machines can be shipped when they are not in use, and factory bosses can think about setting up new lines.
In the past five months alone, the Taipei-based company has announced more than US$1.1 billion of investments into India, Vietnam and Thailand. This includes purchasing 2 million square meters of land in India’s Bengaluru and Telangana, and 480,000m2 in northern Vietnam. In addition, it bought more than US$33 million in machinery directly from Apple to be deployed in India, and a further US$41 million went into its Thai electric vehicle (EV) joint venture Horizon Plus.
There is also a pledge to spend US$780 million over five years in Kaohsiung to make it a hub of EV development and pumped another US$90 million into a US holding company which manages its investment in Wisconsin.
Put together, these are not the spending patterns of a company sitting still or resting on its China laurels. The broad spread of investment locations also recognizes that none alone can be relied upon to replace the mega factories it operates in China’s Shenzhen and Zhengzhou, which will both remain important manufacturing hubs for years to come.
Foxconn’s slow pace of migration outside of China until now, and especially the company’s cautious expansion in India, can easily be viewed as reticence or even as a setback. Instead, what needs to be remembered is that Foxconn built its significant footprint in Shenzhen and later Zhengzhou over a span of 40 years, with continued and unified support across all levels of the Chinese government. It is fanciful to expect any company to replicate such success within a far more raucous and unpredictable nation within a few years.
However, with China’s grip on the global supply chain loosening, and worldwide demand in retreat, now is an opportune time for the company to move forward with its plans to rewrite its business model.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology in Asia. Previously, he was a technology reporter for Bloomberg News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS