Former US undersecretary of state Keith Krach, who is on a four-day visit to Taiwan ending tomorrow, called for strengthened Taiwan-US private-sector ties. He wrote on X on Wednesday that the private sector has a role to play in securing freedom, and that Taiwan’s private sector offers “a big competitive advantage vs the Chinese communist model.”
Separately, the Krach Institute for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue on Tuesday said that bolstering tech security and expanding Taiwan’s role in the Global Trusted Tech Network were among the aims of Krach’s visit.
The network, which comprises “like-minded countries, companies, and individuals who respect the rule of law, human rights, labor practices, national sovereignty and the environment” aims to “defeat authoritarian attempts to limit” the technological advances of that network’s members, Krach said. Given that technology is increasingly important in daily life, and that China’s threat to democracies globally keeps growing, Taiwan must play a role in that network, particularly given its technology sector strengths. The nation is often viewed as a defense aid recipient, but should assert itself as a crucial partner in protecting regional peace and security, including on the digital front.
The US over the past year has come under heavy Chinese and Russian cyberwarfare attacks. In recent years, it has curbed the trade of chips and technologies with those countries. Given its extensive experience dealing with cyberattacks from China, Taiwan’s partnership with the US on cybersecurity would be critical. Taiwan also could be a pivotal source of trusted software and hardware in the face of security concerns over using technology made in China.
“China is growing more ‘brazen’ in its cyberattacks and Russia is targeting US companies with intelligence operations over the war in Ukraine,” the Washington Post on April 27 cited US cybersecurity official Rob Joyce as saying. The US National Security Agency’s Section 702 is “tremendously productive” against cyberthreats, while the agency’s Cybersecurity Collaboration Center shields the US Department of Defense and defense contractors from foreign cyberthreats, he said. Taipei could encourage US authorities to establish branches of those agencies in Taiwan, where both sides could collaborate to defend against Chinese cyberattacks.
A New York Times report on May 24 said that Chinese hackers infiltrated Guam’s telecommunications systems, and that “the system in Guam is particularly important to China because military communications often piggyback on commercial networks” there. The article also said that, after the attacks, US officials “are assessing China’s capabilities — and its willingness — to attack or choke off Taiwan.”
Therefore, US cybersecurity should be the concern of Taipei officials, too, as it directly affects the US’ ability to become involved in Taiwan’s defense in the event of a Taiwan-China military conflict.
Another report by The Associated Press on June 15 said that Chinese hackers were believed to be behind attacks against the networks of hundreds of public and private-sector organizations that included foreign ministries and other government agencies — some of which were reported to be in Taiwan. The report cited Microsoft as saying that China “could be laying the technical groundwork for the potential disruption of critical communications between the US and Asia during future crises.”
Taiwan and the US held the first joint cyberwarfare games in 2019. In April, US lawmakers introduced the Taiwan Cybersecurity Resiliency Act, which is aimed at deepening cooperation between the two countries on cybersecurity. Government support is crucial to empowering the US Department of Defense to assist cybersecurity efforts in Taiwan, but legislative change is complicated and takes time. In the meantime, as Krach has said, “securing freedom is not all up to governments”: the private sector could advance cybersecurity interests and trusted technologies.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS