Recent media reports said that three problematic universities have been ordered to halt new enrollments. This has given rise to questions of whether the government should deal with the campuses and buildings of shuttered universities.
It is estimated that for academic year 2028, more than half of private universities would not be able to recruit Taiwanese students, and if they fail to attract international students or adult learners, these universities would be ordered to shut down.
In that case, aside from turning the campuses and buildings into public housing or sports centers, the government should consider bringing together corporate resources and long-term care services, and transform the sites into “dementia villages.”
Statistics released by the Taiwan Alzheimer Disease Association showed that as of December of last year, the number of people with Alzheimer’s or other forms of dementia totaled 320,000, or 1.37 percent of the population. In other words, one out of 72 people have some form of dementia.
Data and research have shown that the risk of people having dementia increases as they age. Taiwan must be prepared for such a future, and the government must plan how to take care of people with this condition. In an aging society like Taiwan, the dementia population would definitely continue to grow.
People with dementia lose cognitive function, which could lead to other diseases and make them emotionally sensitive. This puts families who look after them under great pressure. Although Taiwan has started to set up dementia-friendly communities, many of these areas are hybrid communities in which people with dementia live alongside the able-bodied. The community might be a friendly one, but it might not be able to satisfy their needs.
To improve the situation, the government could consider the example of the Netherlands’ De Hogeweyk — the world’s first “dementia village,” which opened in 2009 — and build our own. The village could be built on the site of a shuttered university to exclusively serve people with dementia. It would resemble an ordinary residential area, but the stores and facilities there should recruit staff who know and understand how to deal with people with dementia. Social workers and health professionals should also live inside or be stationed at the village.
Meanwhile, long-term care insurance companies and corporations can and should provide support and resources for establishing such a village. In this way, people with dementia would be assisted and attended to mentally and physically in a friendly, warm and professional way. This would lessen the burden on family members while allowing people with dementia to live with dignity.
Lu Chen-wei is an associate research fellow at the Association of Strategic Foresight.
Translated by Emma Liu
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS