French President Emmanuel Macron on Tuesday last week signed France’s largest defense budget increase in 50 years into law. In the same legislation, France pledges to safeguard freedom of navigation in the Taiwan Strait.
The French Parliament passed the bill last month, spurred by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and China’s aggressive stance in Asia. It grants a 413 billion euro (US$453.3 billion) defense budget for the next seven years to push the country’s military spending to more than 2 percent of GDP by 2025.
The legislation says that France has an obligation to defend freedom of navigation in the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea as an Indo-Pacific power.
Due to Macron’s controversial comment in April calling for Europe not to follow the US’ lead and to steer clean of a potential Taiwan conflict, some skeptical Taiwanese politicians have asked whether the legislation is focused only on protecting the country’s freedom of movement, not necessarily the Taiwan Strait or Taiwan.
However, French Senator Olivier Cadic, one of those who proposed the legislation, made it clear during deliberations that Beijing’s predatory acts were what pushed France to contribute to protecting freedom of navigation in the Indo-Pacific region. These acts include attempts to claim international seas as its own, harassment of legal fishing operations, the construction of military bases and incursions into other nations’ sovereign waters, as well as China’s ever-growing military power.
China has not only turned a deaf ear to the rulings of international courts with regard to its claims in the South China Sea, but it also claims the Taiwan Strait, posing a direct threat to global trade, maritime transportation and the international order, Cadic said. A military confrontation in the Taiwan Strait or the South China Sea would have a major effect on global trade and traffic.
The French legislation indicates that protecting peace in Taiwan Strait aligns with France’s strategic national interests, and is essential to a free, open and prosperous Indo-Pacific region. This kind of recognition is growing in international society. The global alliance of democracies has agreed that peace must be maintained in the Taiwan Strait, as regional turmoil would reverberate around the world.
Not only has Washington increased US Navy and Coast Guard transits through the Taiwan Strait; since French frigate the Vendemiaire passed through the waterway in 2019, the French Navy has continued transits about once a year. Other democracies such as Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan and the Netherlands have conducted similar operations.
This is a sign that democratic allies are increasingly asserting their right to freedom of navigation in international waters near China, showing that they are looking at China not only purely in terms of trade, but from a geopolitical military standpoint as well.
As the world’s democracies join forces to face the aggressive actions of China, Russia and North Korea — which are beginning to look like a new “axis of evil” — the Taiwan Strait and Taiwan will inevitably become a crucial strategic channel that they cannot afford to lose.
Taiwan must surely go all-out to defend itself against aggression from across the Strait. It should work with France and other like-minded nations to defend the rules-based international order and the rights of all countries to freely navigate the region’s seas in the region, which in turn would safeguard Taiwan.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS