On Tuesday last week, the US House of Representatives passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which is to proceed to the US Senate for a review. If the bill is passed by the Senate, it is to be sent to the White House and come into effect when US President Joe Biden signs it into law.
The law is of great significance to Taiwan’s international participation. Here are some key points for readers to quickly grasp it:
Through “congressional legislation,” the purpose of the bill is to clarify facts, correct international views and concretely demonstrate US support for Taiwan.
First, through such bipartisan cooperation, the US Congress has put into practice the great importance that it attaches to Taiwan, to counter China’s vicious action of distorting UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to hinder Taiwan’s participation in the international community.
Second, China unilaterally claims that UN Resolution 2758 has recognized that “Taiwan is a part of China,” and directly interprets this as the “one China principle.” It misleads the international community, and belittles Taiwan by depriving it of sovereignty.
Third, the bill says: “The US opposes any initiative that seeks to change Taiwan’s status without the people’s consent.”
Fourth, representatives of both main political parties — from the Republican Party’s Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Michael McCaul to the Democratic Party’s Gregory Meeks, a ranking member of the committee — have publicly expressed support for the bill, saying that Taiwan’s exclusion from the UN system is a loss to the international community and the global system.
The bill argues that the aforementioned UN resolution only addressed the issue of “China’s representation” to the UN, and it did not involve Taiwan.
First, the resolution only addressed the issue of “China’s representation,” as the bill states that it established the representatives of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) government as the only lawful representatives of China and its people.
Second, the UN expelled then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) Republic of China (ROC) government, and it recognized the PRC government as the only lawful representative of China.
Third, the resolution indicated the “three noes” (三個沒有): Not a single word is about “Taiwan” in the text, and it does not recognize Taiwan as a part of the PRC’s territory. In addition, it does not authorize the PRC to represent Taiwan and its people in the UN.
Taiwan belongs to the world, not exclusively to China. Even if China continues to threaten and oppress Taiwan, this would not shake our determination to walk toward the world.
Meanwhile, with the international community’s firm support for the country, Taiwan is to definitely become a key force for peace, prosperity and sustainable development in the region and the world.
Su Wei-cheng is a university lecturer and a former secretary of the speaker of the Legislative Yuan.
Translated by Eddy Chang
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS