On Tuesday last week, the US House of Representatives passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which is to proceed to the US Senate for a review. If the bill is passed by the Senate, it is to be sent to the White House and come into effect when US President Joe Biden signs it into law.
The law is of great significance to Taiwan’s international participation. Here are some key points for readers to quickly grasp it:
Through “congressional legislation,” the purpose of the bill is to clarify facts, correct international views and concretely demonstrate US support for Taiwan.
First, through such bipartisan cooperation, the US Congress has put into practice the great importance that it attaches to Taiwan, to counter China’s vicious action of distorting UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to hinder Taiwan’s participation in the international community.
Second, China unilaterally claims that UN Resolution 2758 has recognized that “Taiwan is a part of China,” and directly interprets this as the “one China principle.” It misleads the international community, and belittles Taiwan by depriving it of sovereignty.
Third, the bill says: “The US opposes any initiative that seeks to change Taiwan’s status without the people’s consent.”
Fourth, representatives of both main political parties — from the Republican Party’s Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Michael McCaul to the Democratic Party’s Gregory Meeks, a ranking member of the committee — have publicly expressed support for the bill, saying that Taiwan’s exclusion from the UN system is a loss to the international community and the global system.
The bill argues that the aforementioned UN resolution only addressed the issue of “China’s representation” to the UN, and it did not involve Taiwan.
First, the resolution only addressed the issue of “China’s representation,” as the bill states that it established the representatives of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) government as the only lawful representatives of China and its people.
Second, the UN expelled then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) Republic of China (ROC) government, and it recognized the PRC government as the only lawful representative of China.
Third, the resolution indicated the “three noes” (三個沒有): Not a single word is about “Taiwan” in the text, and it does not recognize Taiwan as a part of the PRC’s territory. In addition, it does not authorize the PRC to represent Taiwan and its people in the UN.
Taiwan belongs to the world, not exclusively to China. Even if China continues to threaten and oppress Taiwan, this would not shake our determination to walk toward the world.
Meanwhile, with the international community’s firm support for the country, Taiwan is to definitely become a key force for peace, prosperity and sustainable development in the region and the world.
Su Wei-cheng is a university lecturer and a former secretary of the speaker of the Legislative Yuan.
Translated by Eddy Chang
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS