On Tuesday last week, the US House of Representatives passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act, which is to proceed to the US Senate for a review. If the bill is passed by the Senate, it is to be sent to the White House and come into effect when US President Joe Biden signs it into law.
The law is of great significance to Taiwan’s international participation. Here are some key points for readers to quickly grasp it:
Through “congressional legislation,” the purpose of the bill is to clarify facts, correct international views and concretely demonstrate US support for Taiwan.
First, through such bipartisan cooperation, the US Congress has put into practice the great importance that it attaches to Taiwan, to counter China’s vicious action of distorting UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to hinder Taiwan’s participation in the international community.
Second, China unilaterally claims that UN Resolution 2758 has recognized that “Taiwan is a part of China,” and directly interprets this as the “one China principle.” It misleads the international community, and belittles Taiwan by depriving it of sovereignty.
Third, the bill says: “The US opposes any initiative that seeks to change Taiwan’s status without the people’s consent.”
Fourth, representatives of both main political parties — from the Republican Party’s Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Michael McCaul to the Democratic Party’s Gregory Meeks, a ranking member of the committee — have publicly expressed support for the bill, saying that Taiwan’s exclusion from the UN system is a loss to the international community and the global system.
The bill argues that the aforementioned UN resolution only addressed the issue of “China’s representation” to the UN, and it did not involve Taiwan.
First, the resolution only addressed the issue of “China’s representation,” as the bill states that it established the representatives of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) government as the only lawful representatives of China and its people.
Second, the UN expelled then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) Republic of China (ROC) government, and it recognized the PRC government as the only lawful representative of China.
Third, the resolution indicated the “three noes” (三個沒有): Not a single word is about “Taiwan” in the text, and it does not recognize Taiwan as a part of the PRC’s territory. In addition, it does not authorize the PRC to represent Taiwan and its people in the UN.
Taiwan belongs to the world, not exclusively to China. Even if China continues to threaten and oppress Taiwan, this would not shake our determination to walk toward the world.
Meanwhile, with the international community’s firm support for the country, Taiwan is to definitely become a key force for peace, prosperity and sustainable development in the region and the world.
Su Wei-cheng is a university lecturer and a former secretary of the speaker of the Legislative Yuan.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
RSS