The UK film industry revolves around the US’. The dependence is startling just in money terms: Of the nearly US$2.6 billion spent in film and television production in the UK in 2022, US studio-backed projects totaled US$1.36 billion — a 31 percent increase from 2021, according to the British Film Institute. Think of it another way: That rhapsody-in-pink Barbie Land set in last weekend’s blockbuster hit? It was built in the Warner Bros Studios in Leavesden, just north of London.
So, with Tinsel Town USA shut down by the dual strike by actors and writers, Hollywood-on-the-Thames has sputtered to a stop too. The knock-on effects are huge: There are more than 16,000 UK film and TV production companies, mostly small businesses, that in 2020 employed 86,000 people. While British actors have their own union — Equity — many work in productions shut down by walkouts staged by the Writers Guild of America (WGA) and the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Actors (SAG-AFTRA).
People can sense the anxiety when asking film folks here about their US cousins. “We’re hoping the parties resolve their differences soon,” said a spokesperson for Film London, which works with movie companies to set up shoots in the city. Equity is loudly supportive of the strike, but it reminds members that it is illegal to walk out in sympathy from British productions that have no investment from studios that are part of the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP), the US trade association at loggerheads with the writers and actors’ unions.
However, the calamity also raises a tempting opportunity. Should the UK’s skilled film artisans — from actors and writers unaffiliated with US unions to the craftsmen and technicians who build and film extravaganzas such as Barbie — initiate independent productions that they can sell to US studios that might soon be content-starved? That kind of self-starting could help break British dependence on Hollywood financing (and US cinematic visions) — and revive an industry that once rivaled the US’. Indeed, if there is one place where the UK’s soft power has real potency, it is in the anglophilic offices of the big Hollywood studios. Anyway, the British are not up for the strikebreaker role. Everyone here simply says they hope it all blows over fast. At least in public.
However, there is talking going on. US producers have not been quiet. They were scouting for fresh sources even before the 160,000-member actors’ guild joined the WGA strike on July 14. The streaming companies know that overseas productions without big US studio money can come up with gigantic hits (think South Korea and Squid Game).
“Believe me, all conversations are happening,” said one Hollywood insider who asked not to be named because of the sensitivities surrounding the strike. “They’ve been happening in preparation for all this.”
An old-style Hollywood deal is also getting new traction — the so-called “negative pickup.” It’s one where no money exchanges hands until a movie or show is finished. The term originated in the period before digital, when the medium was really film, that is, celluloid — and moviemakers delivered the film negative to the studios. While the filmmakers got no money from the studio, a “negative pickup” in the past was enough to convince a bank to offer financing — the contract being an effective promissory note of money to come once the project was completed. The big studios usually promise to cover all costs and take on distribution (and, of course, the enormous proceeds from that).
That is all sotto voce for now — especially in the UK, where no one wants to damage existing relations with SAG-AFTRA. There is already criticism of potential “backdoor” use of London to circumvent the strike. If it ends soon, the damage would be limited, but the economic pressure on UK film businesses would grow as the US faceoff goes on.
Hollywood insiders do not expect any movement in negotiations until after the US Labor Day weekend in September, the unofficial beginning of fall in the US. Why then? It has little to do with producing fresh content. It is about maximizing the movies already in the pipeline. Fall marks the start of Hollywood’s awards season, when the studios roll out their biggest and most prestigious films. The producers would need the directors, writers and especially the actors who created those movies to promote them — and to juice the box office.
What is the point of the Oscars if the statuettes do not help to sell tickets? After all, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences — which gives out the annual prize — was set up by a studio chief, Louis B. Meyer, the founder of MGM. One raison d’etre: to circumvent unions by coddling actors with gilded trophies. It would be ironic if the awards got producers and actors back to the negotiating table.
It would be really bad news if the AMPTP decides to sacrifice the awards season. That means the standoff would become a war of attrition, but maybe then, the UK film industry might just decide it is time to strike out on its own.
Howard Chua-Eoan is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion covering culture and business. He previously served as Bloomberg Opinion’s international editor and is a former news director at Time magazine. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused